Knee muscle strength – A challenge to measure

Maria Örtqvist, Å. Bartonek, E. Gutierrez-Farewik, E. Broström
{"title":"Knee muscle strength – A challenge to measure","authors":"Maria Örtqvist, Å. Bartonek, E. Gutierrez-Farewik, E. Broström","doi":"10.3109/21679169.2013.865262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aims were to assess the reliability of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measurements using the Strength Measuring Chair (SMC) in children and adults, and to assess agreement between the SMC and an isokinetic dynamometer (ID). 20 healthy children (10/10 boys/girls, 5–13 years) and 23 adults (10/13 men/women, 23–60 years) were included. Muscle strength tests were performed in the SMC and in the ID. The intra-subject reliability was shown to be excellent in both instruments (ICC 0.93–0.99) and an excellent test–retest reliability of measurements in the SMC was found (ICC 0.87–0.93). Agreement between instruments was evaluated with ICC, paired t-test and Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement plots. In both adults’ and children's groups, disagreements were found between the two instruments, with more in the children's group. The SMC, which has previously shown to be valid and reliable for measuring plantarflexor muscle strength, reliably measured knee muscle strength in healthy children and adults. However, the large disagreement found between the instruments, especially in the children's group, warrants care in standardizing measuring positions for different body size and warrants caution in comparing one's muscle strength measured using different assessment methods.","PeriodicalId":186472,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2013.865262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The aims were to assess the reliability of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measurements using the Strength Measuring Chair (SMC) in children and adults, and to assess agreement between the SMC and an isokinetic dynamometer (ID). 20 healthy children (10/10 boys/girls, 5–13 years) and 23 adults (10/13 men/women, 23–60 years) were included. Muscle strength tests were performed in the SMC and in the ID. The intra-subject reliability was shown to be excellent in both instruments (ICC 0.93–0.99) and an excellent test–retest reliability of measurements in the SMC was found (ICC 0.87–0.93). Agreement between instruments was evaluated with ICC, paired t-test and Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement plots. In both adults’ and children's groups, disagreements were found between the two instruments, with more in the children's group. The SMC, which has previously shown to be valid and reliable for measuring plantarflexor muscle strength, reliably measured knee muscle strength in healthy children and adults. However, the large disagreement found between the instruments, especially in the children's group, warrants care in standardizing measuring positions for different body size and warrants caution in comparing one's muscle strength measured using different assessment methods.
膝盖肌肉力量-测量的挑战
目的是评估使用力量测量椅(SMC)测量儿童和成人膝关节伸肌和屈肌力量的可靠性,并评估SMC和等速测功机(ID)之间的一致性。包括20名健康儿童(10/10名男孩/女孩,5-13岁)和23名成年人(10/13名男性/女性,23 - 60岁)。在SMC和ID进行肌力测试。两种仪器的受试者内信度均极好(ICC 0.93-0.99), SMC测量结果的重测信度也极好(ICC 0.87-0.93)。使用ICC、配对t检验和一致性图的Bland-Altman 95%限来评估仪器之间的一致性。在成人组和儿童组中,两种乐器之间都存在分歧,儿童组中分歧更大。SMC先前已被证明是测量跖屈肌力量的有效和可靠的方法,可靠地测量了健康儿童和成人的膝关节肌肉力量。然而,不同的测量工具之间存在很大的差异,尤其是在儿童组中,这就要求我们在标准化不同体型的测量姿势时要小心,在比较使用不同评估方法测量的肌肉力量时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书