Is the World Flat? : A Study on Posthuman Materialisms in the Pandemic Era

Inchan Pak
{"title":"Is the World Flat? : A Study on Posthuman Materialisms in the Pandemic Era","authors":"Inchan Pak","doi":"10.37123/th.2022.11.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unprecedented disasters have urged us to reconsider the relationships between man and matter, between man and nature. There seems no objection to the fact that the global spread of the pandemic and climate crisis derive from the capitalist way of life. Flat ontology is a posthumanist thesis that puts humans on the same plane as matter and nonhumans. This paper discusses the significance and limits of flat ontology that runs through posthuman materialisms including new materialisms and object-oriented ontology. \nThe discussion starts with the humanist tradition of a deep mistrust of matter and the main tenets of flat ontology Latour, DeLanda, and Bryant have argued against it. Their theories, while different from one another, similarly insist on changing the world in terms of the ontological equality or symmetry of entities existing in the world. \nAnalyzing those interrelated approaches critically intervenes in their arguments and examines if flat ontology may have complicit relationships with reality and contribute to the reterritorialization of capitalism. The politics of the posthuman projects to reorient materalism could be evaluated through this study.","PeriodicalId":443880,"journal":{"name":"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37123/th.2022.11.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unprecedented disasters have urged us to reconsider the relationships between man and matter, between man and nature. There seems no objection to the fact that the global spread of the pandemic and climate crisis derive from the capitalist way of life. Flat ontology is a posthumanist thesis that puts humans on the same plane as matter and nonhumans. This paper discusses the significance and limits of flat ontology that runs through posthuman materialisms including new materialisms and object-oriented ontology. The discussion starts with the humanist tradition of a deep mistrust of matter and the main tenets of flat ontology Latour, DeLanda, and Bryant have argued against it. Their theories, while different from one another, similarly insist on changing the world in terms of the ontological equality or symmetry of entities existing in the world. Analyzing those interrelated approaches critically intervenes in their arguments and examines if flat ontology may have complicit relationships with reality and contribute to the reterritorialization of capitalism. The politics of the posthuman projects to reorient materalism could be evaluated through this study.
世界是平的吗?大流行时代的后人类唯物主义研究
前所未有的灾难促使我们重新思考人与物质、人与自然的关系。似乎没有人反对这一事实,即大流行病和气候危机的全球蔓延源于资本主义的生活方式。扁平本体论是一种后人类主义的理论,它把人类与物质和非人类放在同一个平面上。本文讨论了贯穿后人类唯物主义包括新唯物主义和面向对象本体论的扁平本体论的意义和局限性。讨论开始于人文主义对物质的极度不信任,以及拉图尔、德兰达和布莱恩特反对的扁平本体论的主要原则。他们的理论虽然彼此不同,但同样坚持根据世界上存在的实体的本体论平等或对称性来改变世界。批判性地分析这些相互关联的方法可以干预他们的论点,并检查平坦的本体论是否可能与现实有同谋关系,并有助于资本主义的再领土化。透过本研究,我们可以评估后人类计划中对物质主义重新定位的政治性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信