(Still) Fighting the Financial Crisis of 2008: Ten Years Later

R. Bruner
{"title":"(Still) Fighting the Financial Crisis of 2008: Ten Years Later","authors":"R. Bruner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3293513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Set in the spring of 2018, the US Congress contemplated changes to the Dodd-Frank Act in an effort to improve financial regulation in the United States. The case offers details on the slow recovery from the financial crisis of 2008, on protest and political movements that ensued, on the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, and on 14 proposals for new financial regulation. As of 2018, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jeb Hensarling offer differing regulatory agendas for the financial services industry in the United States. \nExcerpt \nUVA-F-1838 \nJul. 27, 2018 \n(Still) Fighting the Financial Crisis of 2008: Ten Years Later \nA decade after the financial crisis of 2008, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jeb Hensarling led continuing debates over the adequacy of laws and regulations to prevent or mitigate future financial crises. Senator Warren advocated tighter regulation; Representative Hensarling argued that regulations were ineffective, costly, and had retarded the recovery of the economy from the crisis of 2008. By 2018, the ongoing political ferment around financial crises revealed that anger about the crisis of 2008 had not yet subsided. Over a dozen new remedies commanded the consideration of public leaders. What problems were these proposals trying to fix? And from the vantage point of a decade later, which remedies seemed appropriate? Why? More generally, should the aim of regulation be to reduce the risk of future crises to zero? \nIn 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act (see Exhibit1) that imposed special stress tests and capital requirements on “significantly important financial institutions” (SIFIs), limited the ability of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) to respond as a lender of last resort, and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to regulate new financial products. In signing the act, President Barack Obama said, “These reforms represent the strongest consumer financial protections in history…because of this law, the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street's mistakes.” \nIn 2011, a commission chartered by Congress issued a report on the crisis that sparked controversy and recriminations about the causes of and responsibility for the crisis. In 2008, 2010, and 2012, the Fed pursued programs of “quantitative easing” (QE), massive asset purchases aimed at driving interest rates to historically low levels and stimulating the economy. Protests and new political movements met these and other government actions with hostility—and culminated in an especially polarizing presidential campaign in 2016. \n. . .","PeriodicalId":121773,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3293513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Set in the spring of 2018, the US Congress contemplated changes to the Dodd-Frank Act in an effort to improve financial regulation in the United States. The case offers details on the slow recovery from the financial crisis of 2008, on protest and political movements that ensued, on the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, and on 14 proposals for new financial regulation. As of 2018, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jeb Hensarling offer differing regulatory agendas for the financial services industry in the United States. Excerpt UVA-F-1838 Jul. 27, 2018 (Still) Fighting the Financial Crisis of 2008: Ten Years Later A decade after the financial crisis of 2008, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jeb Hensarling led continuing debates over the adequacy of laws and regulations to prevent or mitigate future financial crises. Senator Warren advocated tighter regulation; Representative Hensarling argued that regulations were ineffective, costly, and had retarded the recovery of the economy from the crisis of 2008. By 2018, the ongoing political ferment around financial crises revealed that anger about the crisis of 2008 had not yet subsided. Over a dozen new remedies commanded the consideration of public leaders. What problems were these proposals trying to fix? And from the vantage point of a decade later, which remedies seemed appropriate? Why? More generally, should the aim of regulation be to reduce the risk of future crises to zero? In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act (see Exhibit1) that imposed special stress tests and capital requirements on “significantly important financial institutions” (SIFIs), limited the ability of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) to respond as a lender of last resort, and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to regulate new financial products. In signing the act, President Barack Obama said, “These reforms represent the strongest consumer financial protections in history…because of this law, the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street's mistakes.” In 2011, a commission chartered by Congress issued a report on the crisis that sparked controversy and recriminations about the causes of and responsibility for the crisis. In 2008, 2010, and 2012, the Fed pursued programs of “quantitative easing” (QE), massive asset purchases aimed at driving interest rates to historically low levels and stimulating the economy. Protests and new political movements met these and other government actions with hostility—and culminated in an especially polarizing presidential campaign in 2016. . . .
(仍然)对抗2008年金融危机:十年后
以2018年春天为背景,美国国会考虑修改《多德-弗兰克法案》,以改善美国的金融监管。该案例详细介绍了2008年金融危机后的缓慢复苏、随后的抗议和政治运动、2010年的《多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act)以及14项新金融监管提案。截至2018年,参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)和众议员杰布·亨萨林(Jeb Hensarling)为美国金融服务业提出了不同的监管议程。2008年金融危机十年后,参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)和众议员杰布·亨萨林(Jeb Hensarling)领导了关于法律法规是否足以预防或缓解未来金融危机的持续辩论。参议员沃伦主张加强监管;众议员亨萨林认为,监管是无效的,昂贵的,并且阻碍了经济从2008年的危机中复苏。到2018年,围绕金融危机的持续政治骚动表明,人们对2008年危机的愤怒尚未消退。十几项新的补救措施需要政府领导人的考虑。这些提议试图解决哪些问题?从十年后的有利位置来看,哪些补救措施似乎是合适的?为什么?更笼统地说,监管的目标应该是将未来危机的风险降至零吗?2010年,国会通过了《多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act),对“重要金融机构”(sifi)实施了特殊的压力测试和资本要求,限制了美联储(Fed)作为最后贷款人的应对能力,并成立了消费者金融保护局(Consumer financial Protection Bureau)来监管新的金融产品。奥巴马总统在签署法案时说:“这些改革代表了历史上最强有力的消费者金融保护措施……由于这项法律,美国人民再也不会被要求为华尔街的错误买单了。”2011年,美国国会授权的一个委员会发布了一份关于这场危机的报告,引发了关于这场危机的原因和责任的争议和指责。在2008年、2010年和2012年,美联储推行了“量化宽松”(QE)计划,即大规模购买资产,旨在将利率压低至历史最低水平,刺激经济。抗议和新的政治运动对这些和其他政府行动充满敌意,并在2016年特别两极分化的总统竞选中达到高潮. . . .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信