The Heart of the Matter: Patient Autonomy as a Model for the Wellbeing of Technology Users

Emanuelle Burton, K. Clayville, J. Goldsmith, Nicholas Mattei
{"title":"The Heart of the Matter: Patient Autonomy as a Model for the Wellbeing of Technology Users","authors":"Emanuelle Burton, K. Clayville, J. Goldsmith, Nicholas Mattei","doi":"10.1145/3306618.3314254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We draw on concepts in medical ethics to consider how computer science, and AI in particular, can develop critical tools for thinking concretely about technology's impact on the wellbeing of the people who use it. We focus on patient autonomy---the ability to set the terms of one's encounter with medicine---and on the mediating concepts of informed consent and decisional capacity, which enable doctors to honor patients' autonomy in messy and non-ideal circumstances. This comparative study is organized around a fictional case study of a heart patient with cardiac implants. Using this case study, we identify points of overlap and of difference between medical ethics and technology ethics, and leverage a discussion of that intertwined scenario to offer initial practical suggestions about how we can adapt the concepts of decisional capacity and informed consent to the discussion of technology design.","PeriodicalId":418125,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We draw on concepts in medical ethics to consider how computer science, and AI in particular, can develop critical tools for thinking concretely about technology's impact on the wellbeing of the people who use it. We focus on patient autonomy---the ability to set the terms of one's encounter with medicine---and on the mediating concepts of informed consent and decisional capacity, which enable doctors to honor patients' autonomy in messy and non-ideal circumstances. This comparative study is organized around a fictional case study of a heart patient with cardiac implants. Using this case study, we identify points of overlap and of difference between medical ethics and technology ethics, and leverage a discussion of that intertwined scenario to offer initial practical suggestions about how we can adapt the concepts of decisional capacity and informed consent to the discussion of technology design.
问题的核心:患者自主作为技术用户福祉的模型
我们利用医学伦理学的概念来考虑计算机科学,特别是人工智能,如何开发关键工具,以具体思考技术对使用它的人的福祉的影响。我们关注的是病人的自主权——设定自己与药物接触条件的能力——以及知情同意和决策能力的中介概念,这使医生能够在混乱和非理想的情况下尊重病人的自主权。这个比较研究是围绕一个虚构的心脏患者植入心脏的案例研究组织的。通过本案例研究,我们确定了医学伦理和技术伦理之间的重叠点和不同点,并利用对这种相互交织的情况的讨论,就我们如何将决策能力和知情同意的概念适应于技术设计的讨论提供初步的实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信