Assessing Validity of Diffusion Controlled Model in Acid Neutralization of Lubricant Oil

Divit Gulati, Jayesh Jawandhia
{"title":"Assessing Validity of Diffusion Controlled Model in Acid Neutralization of Lubricant Oil","authors":"Divit Gulati, Jayesh Jawandhia","doi":"10.11648/J.AJCBE.20210502.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engine corrosion has been a long prevalent problem which is further aggravated by acids produced during combustion of fuels. Sulphur containing fuels produce sulphuric acid which must be neutralized in order to prevent corrosion at the engine cylinder lining and piston rings. In order to prevent this corrosion, lubrication oil used in combustion engines contains basic additives like CaCO3-based reverse micelles for neutralizing the acid produced. The mechanism and rate limiting step in the reaction between acid droplets and basic reverse micelles has long been a subject of study. Literature on sulpluric acid droplets neutralization speculates that diffusion of micelles towards the acid droplet is the rate limiting step. However, through this research, we have proved that a diffusion-controlled mechanism alone is not applicable. This has been done by studying various capillary video microscopy experiments on sulphuric, nitric and acetic acid. To prove the invalidity of a diffusion-controlled mechanism, we have assessed the diffusion coefficient and the viscosity at different temperature. Models for finding the diffusion coefficient & viscosity are based on Fick’s law and Stokes Einstein equation respectively. The obtained viscosity from assuming a diffusion-controlled model is compared to observed viscosity (actual viscosity) in lubricant oil to measure deviation of diffusion-controlled model from actual neutralization kinetics. Finally, we have hypothesized alternative reaction mechanisms to explain the considerable deviation found in viscosity values.","PeriodicalId":337881,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJCBE.20210502.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engine corrosion has been a long prevalent problem which is further aggravated by acids produced during combustion of fuels. Sulphur containing fuels produce sulphuric acid which must be neutralized in order to prevent corrosion at the engine cylinder lining and piston rings. In order to prevent this corrosion, lubrication oil used in combustion engines contains basic additives like CaCO3-based reverse micelles for neutralizing the acid produced. The mechanism and rate limiting step in the reaction between acid droplets and basic reverse micelles has long been a subject of study. Literature on sulpluric acid droplets neutralization speculates that diffusion of micelles towards the acid droplet is the rate limiting step. However, through this research, we have proved that a diffusion-controlled mechanism alone is not applicable. This has been done by studying various capillary video microscopy experiments on sulphuric, nitric and acetic acid. To prove the invalidity of a diffusion-controlled mechanism, we have assessed the diffusion coefficient and the viscosity at different temperature. Models for finding the diffusion coefficient & viscosity are based on Fick’s law and Stokes Einstein equation respectively. The obtained viscosity from assuming a diffusion-controlled model is compared to observed viscosity (actual viscosity) in lubricant oil to measure deviation of diffusion-controlled model from actual neutralization kinetics. Finally, we have hypothesized alternative reaction mechanisms to explain the considerable deviation found in viscosity values.
润滑油酸中和扩散控制模型的有效性评价
发动机腐蚀一直是一个普遍存在的问题,燃料燃烧过程中产生的酸进一步加剧了发动机腐蚀。含硫燃料产生的硫酸必须中和,以防止腐蚀发动机缸衬和活塞环。为了防止这种腐蚀,内燃机中使用的润滑油含有碱性添加剂,如碳酸钙基反胶束,以中和所产生的酸。酸滴与碱性反胶束反应的机理和限速步骤一直是人们研究的课题。关于硫酸液滴中和的文献推测,胶束向硫酸液滴的扩散是限速步骤。然而,通过这项研究,我们证明了扩散控制机制本身是不适用的。这是通过研究各种毛细管视频显微镜对硫酸、硝酸和乙酸的实验来完成的。为了证明扩散控制机制的不合理性,我们评估了扩散系数和不同温度下的粘度。扩散系数和粘度的计算模型分别基于菲克定律和斯托克斯-爱因斯坦方程。将假设扩散控制模型得到的粘度与润滑油中观测到的粘度(实际粘度)进行比较,以测量扩散控制模型与实际中和动力学的偏差。最后,我们假设了其他反应机制来解释在粘度值中发现的相当大的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信