Comparative study on the prebiotic effects of Inulin and aqueous extract of Vernonia amygdalina on growth and intestinal morphometry of broiler chicken (Cobb strain)

I. N. Ugokwe, C. U. Ugokwe
{"title":"Comparative study on the prebiotic effects of Inulin and aqueous extract of Vernonia amygdalina on growth and intestinal morphometry of broiler chicken (Cobb strain)","authors":"I. N. Ugokwe, C. U. Ugokwe","doi":"10.31248/jasvm2022.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibiotic misuses aimed at improving growth performance in poultry production have resulted to widespread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry. Recently, prebiotics are accepted as preferred alternatives. The aim of this study was to compare the prebiotic activities of a known and commercially available substance, inulin and a locally available plant, Vernonia amygdalina (bitter leaf) on growth performance and intestinal morphometry of broiler chicken. Sixty day-old broiler chicken (Cobb strain) employed in this study were acclimatized for three weeks and randomly divided into six treatment groups and a control. The treatment groups were further divided into the Inulin group treated with 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg of Inulin and the Vernonia group treated with 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg of Vernonia amygdalina (VA) aqueous extract. After three weeks of prebiotic administration, samples were collected to ascertain effects on body weight, intestinal length and histomorphological measurements of the intestinal villi and crypts were determined. Results showed that body weight did not differ significantly (p>0.05) with both prebiotic administration but a higher weight gain of 1.216 kg and 1.334kg were observed with 20 mg/kg inulin and 100 mg/kg VA administration respectively. Administrations of both prebiotics were not found to significantly affect intestinal length measurement (p>0.05). However, they were found to significantly increase (p<0.05) the intestinal villus height and crypt depth in the treatment groups when compared to the control group. Increased villus height, which may suggest enhanced absorptive function, were improved at dosing broilers with 20 mg/kg inulin and 100 mg/kg VA. Concluding, the effects of both prebiotics; inulin and Vernonia amygdalina aqueous extract on enhancement of growth performance and intestinal function are comparable. Where the effect of inulin was observed to be dose dependent, the effects of Vernonia amygdalina aqueous extract was observed to decline above 100 mg/kg.","PeriodicalId":383871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31248/jasvm2022.308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Antibiotic misuses aimed at improving growth performance in poultry production have resulted to widespread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry. Recently, prebiotics are accepted as preferred alternatives. The aim of this study was to compare the prebiotic activities of a known and commercially available substance, inulin and a locally available plant, Vernonia amygdalina (bitter leaf) on growth performance and intestinal morphometry of broiler chicken. Sixty day-old broiler chicken (Cobb strain) employed in this study were acclimatized for three weeks and randomly divided into six treatment groups and a control. The treatment groups were further divided into the Inulin group treated with 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg of Inulin and the Vernonia group treated with 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg of Vernonia amygdalina (VA) aqueous extract. After three weeks of prebiotic administration, samples were collected to ascertain effects on body weight, intestinal length and histomorphological measurements of the intestinal villi and crypts were determined. Results showed that body weight did not differ significantly (p>0.05) with both prebiotic administration but a higher weight gain of 1.216 kg and 1.334kg were observed with 20 mg/kg inulin and 100 mg/kg VA administration respectively. Administrations of both prebiotics were not found to significantly affect intestinal length measurement (p>0.05). However, they were found to significantly increase (p<0.05) the intestinal villus height and crypt depth in the treatment groups when compared to the control group. Increased villus height, which may suggest enhanced absorptive function, were improved at dosing broilers with 20 mg/kg inulin and 100 mg/kg VA. Concluding, the effects of both prebiotics; inulin and Vernonia amygdalina aqueous extract on enhancement of growth performance and intestinal function are comparable. Where the effect of inulin was observed to be dose dependent, the effects of Vernonia amygdalina aqueous extract was observed to decline above 100 mg/kg.
菊粉与苦杏仁水提物对Cobb型肉鸡生长和肠道形态影响的比较研究
在家禽生产中,为了提高生长性能而滥用抗生素已导致家禽中普遍存在抗菌素耐药性。最近,益生元被认为是首选的替代品。本研究的目的是比较一种已知的和市售的物质菊粉和一种当地可用的植物苦叶(Vernonia amygdalina)对肉鸡生长性能和肠道形态的益生元活性。本试验选用60日龄Cobb品系肉鸡,驯化3周后随机分为6个处理组和1个对照组。将各组进一步分为菊粉5、10、20 mg/kg处理组和苦杏仁水提物50、100、200 mg/kg处理组。服用益生元三周后,收集样本以确定对体重、肠长和肠绒毛和隐窝的组织形态学测量的影响。结果表明:饲粮中添加20 mg/kg的菊粉和100 mg/kg的VA对仔猪体重无显著影响(p>0.05),但饲粮中添加20 mg/kg的菊粉和100 mg/kg的VA的仔猪增重分别为1.216 kg和1.334kg。两种益生元对肠长测量无显著影响(p>0.05)。但与对照组相比,各治疗组的肠绒毛高度和隐窝深度均显著增加(p<0.05)。饲粮中添加20 mg/kg菊粉和100 mg/kg VA可提高肉鸡的绒毛高度,从而提高肉鸡的吸收功能。菊粉和苦杏仁水提物在提高生长性能和肠道功能方面具有可比性。菊粉的作用呈剂量依赖性,而苦杏仁水提物的作用在100 mg/kg以上就会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信