{"title":"Comparison of two causal inference methods: linear regression and matching score and introduction of causal forest","authors":"Zhiqi Huang, W. Mo","doi":"10.1117/12.2679249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence, the introduction of causal inference will improve the accuracy of machine analysis of data. This work aims to introduce three methods of calculating causal effect, linear regression, propensity score matching and causal forest, illuminate some about the combination of causal inference and matching-learning. Here, we substitute the dataset National Supported Work experiment by Lalonde (1986) into three methods and compare the results. We show experimentally that causal forest Causal forests can minimize data bias and obtain more accurate estimates of causal effects.","PeriodicalId":301595,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Pure, Applied, and Computational Mathematics","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Pure, Applied, and Computational Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2679249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Under the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence, the introduction of causal inference will improve the accuracy of machine analysis of data. This work aims to introduce three methods of calculating causal effect, linear regression, propensity score matching and causal forest, illuminate some about the combination of causal inference and matching-learning. Here, we substitute the dataset National Supported Work experiment by Lalonde (1986) into three methods and compare the results. We show experimentally that causal forest Causal forests can minimize data bias and obtain more accurate estimates of causal effects.
在人工智能快速发展的背景下,引入因果推理将提高机器分析数据的准确性。本文介绍了三种计算因果效应的方法:线性回归、倾向得分匹配和因果森林,并对因果推理与匹配学习相结合的一些问题进行了阐述。在这里,我们将Lalonde(1986)的数据集National Supported Work experiment替换为三种方法,并对结果进行比较。我们通过实验证明,因果森林可以最小化数据偏差,并获得更准确的因果效应估计。