WORLD'S BEST PRACTICE ANALYSIS FOR CRITICAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

S. Gnatyuk, Yuliia Polishchuk, Yuliia Sotnichenko, Dauriya Zhaksigulova
{"title":"WORLD'S BEST PRACTICE ANALYSIS FOR CRITICAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION","authors":"S. Gnatyuk, Yuliia Polishchuk, Yuliia Sotnichenko, Dauriya Zhaksigulova","doi":"10.28925/2663-4023.2020.10.184196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the large number of cyber incidents that occur every day, the process of critical infrastructure protection is an important not only technical but also scientific task. However, not all states in the world have an opportunity to provide high-quality protection of such infrastructure at a high level. Based on the fact that the critical information infrastructure protection should be managed at the state level, states need to develop a regulatory framework to address the above issue. Considering the legal framework of Ukraine, as in most post-Soviet countries, there is no effective approach to the protection of critical information infrastructure, such as in the USA or in the EU. The legislation of Ukraine identifies only certain objects of the socio-economic sphere, emergencies where they can lead to socially dangerous consequences, while a single procedure for identification and classification of critical infrastructure is not developed. A number of basic terms in the field of critical infrastructure protection from cyber threats, including “critical infrastructure” term, remain normatively vague. The mechanism of organization of activity and interaction of state and private structures in the process of critical infrastructure protection needs scientific substantiation. In this paper, the analysis of the world’s best practices concerning critical information infrastructure protection was carried out, that allows to improve qualitatively, at the state legislative level and practice, process of critical information infrastructure protection of Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":198390,"journal":{"name":"Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2020.10.184196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the large number of cyber incidents that occur every day, the process of critical infrastructure protection is an important not only technical but also scientific task. However, not all states in the world have an opportunity to provide high-quality protection of such infrastructure at a high level. Based on the fact that the critical information infrastructure protection should be managed at the state level, states need to develop a regulatory framework to address the above issue. Considering the legal framework of Ukraine, as in most post-Soviet countries, there is no effective approach to the protection of critical information infrastructure, such as in the USA or in the EU. The legislation of Ukraine identifies only certain objects of the socio-economic sphere, emergencies where they can lead to socially dangerous consequences, while a single procedure for identification and classification of critical infrastructure is not developed. A number of basic terms in the field of critical infrastructure protection from cyber threats, including “critical infrastructure” term, remain normatively vague. The mechanism of organization of activity and interaction of state and private structures in the process of critical infrastructure protection needs scientific substantiation. In this paper, the analysis of the world’s best practices concerning critical information infrastructure protection was carried out, that allows to improve qualitatively, at the state legislative level and practice, process of critical information infrastructure protection of Ukraine.
全球关键信息基础设施保护的最佳实践分析
根据每天发生的大量网络事件,关键基础设施的保护过程不仅是一项重要的技术任务,也是一项重要的科学任务。然而,并非世界上所有国家都有机会对此类基础设施提供高质量的高水平保护。基于关键信息基础设施保护应在州一级进行管理的事实,各州需要制定一个监管框架来解决上述问题。考虑到乌克兰的法律框架,就像大多数后苏联国家一样,没有有效的方法来保护关键的信息基础设施,比如在美国或欧盟。乌克兰的立法只确定社会经济领域的某些对象,即可能导致社会危险后果的紧急情况,而没有制定确定和分类关键基础设施的单一程序。保护关键基础设施免受网络威胁领域的一些基本术语,包括“关键基础设施”术语,在规范上仍然含糊不清。关键基础设施保护过程中的活动组织机制和公私结构互动机制需要科学论证。本文对全球关键信息基础设施保护的最佳实践进行了分析,从而从国家立法层面和实践层面对乌克兰关键信息基础设施保护的过程进行了质的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信