Clash of the Titans: Bankruptcy Court and FERC Collide Over Jurisdiction Yet Again

A. Sabino
{"title":"Clash of the Titans: Bankruptcy Court and FERC Collide Over Jurisdiction Yet Again","authors":"A. Sabino","doi":"10.1002/gas.22164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"latory Commission” (FERC) are typically not words one hears together in the realm of the natural gas and electricity industry. After all, the energy sector for the most part offers boundless opportunities for profit and avoidance of bankruptcies. Nevertheless, the vast fluctuations and the vagaries of markets, technological change, and economic conditions at times force industry participants to seek refuge in the bankruptcy courts, which presents an immediate problem. Normally participants in the interstate markets for natural gas and electricity are answerable, first and foremost, to FERC. As far back as 1935 and the New Deal, Congress assigned FERC (and its predecessors) the responsibility to maintain fair and orderly markets in both those vital commodities. Among other things, the agency is tasked with protecting the “public good” when approving rates charged for natural gas and electricity. Clash of the Titans: Bankruptcy Court and FERC Collide Over Jurisdiction Yet Again","PeriodicalId":311429,"journal":{"name":"Natural Gas & Electricity","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Gas & Electricity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.22164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

latory Commission” (FERC) are typically not words one hears together in the realm of the natural gas and electricity industry. After all, the energy sector for the most part offers boundless opportunities for profit and avoidance of bankruptcies. Nevertheless, the vast fluctuations and the vagaries of markets, technological change, and economic conditions at times force industry participants to seek refuge in the bankruptcy courts, which presents an immediate problem. Normally participants in the interstate markets for natural gas and electricity are answerable, first and foremost, to FERC. As far back as 1935 and the New Deal, Congress assigned FERC (and its predecessors) the responsibility to maintain fair and orderly markets in both those vital commodities. Among other things, the agency is tasked with protecting the “public good” when approving rates charged for natural gas and electricity. Clash of the Titans: Bankruptcy Court and FERC Collide Over Jurisdiction Yet Again
泰坦的冲突:破产法院和联邦电力监管委员会在管辖权上再次发生冲突
在天然气和电力行业,人们通常不会听到“实验室委员会”(FERC)这样的字眼。毕竟,能源行业在很大程度上提供了无限的盈利和避免破产的机会。然而,市场的巨大波动和变幻莫测、技术变革和经济状况有时迫使行业参与者向破产法庭寻求庇护,这就提出了一个紧迫的问题。通常,州际天然气和电力市场的参与者首先要对联邦能源管理委员会负责。早在1935年和新政时期,国会就赋予联邦监管委员会(及其前身)维持这两种重要商品公平有序市场的责任。除其他事项外,该机构的任务是在批准天然气和电力收费时保护“公共利益”。泰坦的冲突:破产法院和联邦电力监管委员会在管辖权上再次发生冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信