PENGARUH PROPORSI TEPUNG UBI KUNING, MOCAF, TEPUNG KACANG KEDELAI TERHADAP GIZI MAKRO, SERAT, DAN NILAI SENSORI SNACK BAR

Ayu - Qoriah
{"title":"PENGARUH PROPORSI TEPUNG UBI KUNING, MOCAF, TEPUNG KACANG KEDELAI TERHADAP GIZI MAKRO, SERAT, DAN NILAI SENSORI SNACK BAR","authors":"Ayu - Qoriah","doi":"10.30587/ghidzamediajurnal.v2i2.3083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yellow yam flour, mocaf and soybean flour are sources of complex carbohydrates with high fiber. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the proportions of yellow yam flour, mocaf, and soybean flour on the levels of macronutrients, crude fiber, and sensory snack bar products. The research method used an experimental design with a completely randomized design consisting of 1 control formula (F0) and 3 treatment formulas (F1, F2, and F3). The research data were analyzed using the ANOVA test and Duncan's further test. The organoleptic test used consumer panelists with 30 panelists whose results were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test. The results of the chemical test of macronutrients and crude fiber content were different from the P-value sig. < 0.05. The protein content of code F0, F1, F2 and F3 is 5.40 g; 7.98 g; 8.35 g; 8.60 g. The fat content is 14.91 g; 15.36 g; 15.97 g; 16.12 g, the carbohydrate content is 54.05 g; 52.89 g; 52.80 g; 52.50 g, the crude fiber content is 1.24 g; 3.77 g; 4.19 g; 4.61 g. Even though, the results of the hedonic test for each formulation (F0, F1, F2 and F3) for the color and taste parameters there are differences with the asym sig value of the parameter being 0.00. Though, the aroma and texture parameters there is no difference with the asymp value. Sig 0.12 and 0.09. The most preferred mean rank on the snack bar is the formula F0 (74.61), the preferred treatment formula is F3 (58.65).","PeriodicalId":322525,"journal":{"name":"Ghidza Media Jurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghidza Media Jurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30587/ghidzamediajurnal.v2i2.3083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yellow yam flour, mocaf and soybean flour are sources of complex carbohydrates with high fiber. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the proportions of yellow yam flour, mocaf, and soybean flour on the levels of macronutrients, crude fiber, and sensory snack bar products. The research method used an experimental design with a completely randomized design consisting of 1 control formula (F0) and 3 treatment formulas (F1, F2, and F3). The research data were analyzed using the ANOVA test and Duncan's further test. The organoleptic test used consumer panelists with 30 panelists whose results were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test. The results of the chemical test of macronutrients and crude fiber content were different from the P-value sig. < 0.05. The protein content of code F0, F1, F2 and F3 is 5.40 g; 7.98 g; 8.35 g; 8.60 g. The fat content is 14.91 g; 15.36 g; 15.97 g; 16.12 g, the carbohydrate content is 54.05 g; 52.89 g; 52.80 g; 52.50 g, the crude fiber content is 1.24 g; 3.77 g; 4.19 g; 4.61 g. Even though, the results of the hedonic test for each formulation (F0, F1, F2 and F3) for the color and taste parameters there are differences with the asym sig value of the parameter being 0.00. Though, the aroma and texture parameters there is no difference with the asymp value. Sig 0.12 and 0.09. The most preferred mean rank on the snack bar is the formula F0 (74.61), the preferred treatment formula is F3 (58.65).
由黄甘薯、咖啡、豆粉所产生的影响影响到宏罗营养、纤维和小草棒感官价值
黄山药粉、摩卡咖啡和大豆粉是高纤维复合碳水化合物的来源。本研究的目的是确定黄山药粉、摩卡咖啡和大豆粉的比例对大量营养素、粗纤维和感官小吃店产品水平的影响。研究方法采用完全随机设计的试验设计,包括1个对照配方(F0)和3个处理配方(F1、F2、F3)。采用方差分析和邓肯进一步检验对研究数据进行分析。感官测试使用消费者小组成员和30名小组成员,他们的结果使用Kruskal Wallis测试进行分析。粗纤维含量和常量营养素的化学试验结果p值差异显著,p值< 0.05。编码F0、F1、F2和F3的蛋白质含量为5.40 g;7.98克;8.35克;8.60 g。脂肪含量14.91 g;15.36克;15.97克;16.12 g,碳水化合物含量54.05 g;52.89克;52.80克;52.50 g,粗纤维含量1.24 g;3.77克;4.19克;4.61 g。尽管每种配方(F0, F1, F2和F3)对颜色和味道参数的hedonic测试结果存在差异,参数的不对称标志值为0.00。然而,香气和质地参数没有差异与asymp值。Sig为0.12和0.09。小吃店上最受青睐的平均排名为配方F0(74.61),最受青睐的处理配方F3(58.65)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信