{"title":"The German Corporate Governance System","authors":"D. Charny","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.125188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among American corporate law scholars, contemporary appreciation of the distinctive features of the German corporate model has proceeded in two stages. The first stage accomplished an intellectual paradigm shift, a genuine exemplification of this much-overused concept. Inevitably, as with any paradigmatic reconceptualization, a second wave of empirical testing and theoretical refinement followed. As Roe and other scholars had anticipated, the broad picture of several radically different corporate systems presented more a set of ideal types than a complete description of the corporate world. Finally, the systems have been subject to contemporary economic pressures such as globalization, the dissemination of new production methods, and the collapse of welfare-state regimes that made the stable post-war equilibria appear to be mere temporary stopping points on the way to some yet unspecified but undoubtedly brave new world. Within the scope of this brief conference paper, I will offer a more nuanced assessment of where we stand in light of the revisionist research.","PeriodicalId":415084,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.125188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
Among American corporate law scholars, contemporary appreciation of the distinctive features of the German corporate model has proceeded in two stages. The first stage accomplished an intellectual paradigm shift, a genuine exemplification of this much-overused concept. Inevitably, as with any paradigmatic reconceptualization, a second wave of empirical testing and theoretical refinement followed. As Roe and other scholars had anticipated, the broad picture of several radically different corporate systems presented more a set of ideal types than a complete description of the corporate world. Finally, the systems have been subject to contemporary economic pressures such as globalization, the dissemination of new production methods, and the collapse of welfare-state regimes that made the stable post-war equilibria appear to be mere temporary stopping points on the way to some yet unspecified but undoubtedly brave new world. Within the scope of this brief conference paper, I will offer a more nuanced assessment of where we stand in light of the revisionist research.