Difference between diabetic macular edema and pseudophakic macular edema using optical coherence tomography

Mostafa Abdelfattah, O. Ali, Gamal Othman, M. Hussein
{"title":"Difference between diabetic macular edema and pseudophakic macular edema using optical coherence tomography","authors":"Mostafa Abdelfattah, O. Ali, Gamal Othman, M. Hussein","doi":"10.4103/erj.erj_4_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Macular edema (ME) is a common pathologic condition causing vision impairment. Diabetic retinopathy is a common cause of ME which can also develop after cataract surgery. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive diagnostic technique that provides imaging of fine retinal details. Proper diagnosis of the underlying etiology shall affect the management. Aims: This study aims to differentiation between diabetic and pseudophakic ME (DME and PME) using OCT. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study of 2 Groups; A: 30 eyes with DME and B: 20 eyes with PME. Subjects and Methods: Full clinical evaluation, OCT scanning, and data analysis were done for both groups. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS software v. 16 was used for: Descriptive statistics, mean, range, and standard deviation. Student's t-test was used for comparison between means. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between variables. Results: Maximum macular thickness and central macular thickness were elevated in both groups but were higher in PME group (P = 0.042 and P = 0.00001, respectively). Macular thickness/volume ratio (TVR) was higher in PME group (P = 0.00001). Cystic changes had different distribution patterns; ganglion cell layer and retinal nerve fiber layer layers were free in PME(Pseudophakic macular edema) while inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer were affected in both groups (P = 0.0061). Epiretinal membranes were found much more in DME group (P = 0.0452). Dome-shaped macula was frequently noticed in PME group (P = 0.043). Conclusions: PME and DME have different OCT features; higher TVR, dome-shaped macula, absence of ERM suggest PME while lower TVR, presence of inner retinal cysts and/or ERM suggest DME.","PeriodicalId":201997,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Retina Journal","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Retina Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/erj.erj_4_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Macular edema (ME) is a common pathologic condition causing vision impairment. Diabetic retinopathy is a common cause of ME which can also develop after cataract surgery. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive diagnostic technique that provides imaging of fine retinal details. Proper diagnosis of the underlying etiology shall affect the management. Aims: This study aims to differentiation between diabetic and pseudophakic ME (DME and PME) using OCT. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study of 2 Groups; A: 30 eyes with DME and B: 20 eyes with PME. Subjects and Methods: Full clinical evaluation, OCT scanning, and data analysis were done for both groups. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS software v. 16 was used for: Descriptive statistics, mean, range, and standard deviation. Student's t-test was used for comparison between means. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between variables. Results: Maximum macular thickness and central macular thickness were elevated in both groups but were higher in PME group (P = 0.042 and P = 0.00001, respectively). Macular thickness/volume ratio (TVR) was higher in PME group (P = 0.00001). Cystic changes had different distribution patterns; ganglion cell layer and retinal nerve fiber layer layers were free in PME(Pseudophakic macular edema) while inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer were affected in both groups (P = 0.0061). Epiretinal membranes were found much more in DME group (P = 0.0452). Dome-shaped macula was frequently noticed in PME group (P = 0.043). Conclusions: PME and DME have different OCT features; higher TVR, dome-shaped macula, absence of ERM suggest PME while lower TVR, presence of inner retinal cysts and/or ERM suggest DME.
利用光学相干断层扫描观察糖尿病性黄斑水肿与假性黄斑水肿的差异
背景:黄斑水肿(ME)是一种常见的导致视力损害的病理状况。糖尿病视网膜病变是ME的常见病因,也可在白内障手术后发生。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)是一种无创诊断技术,可提供视网膜精细细节的成像。对潜在病因的正确诊断将影响治疗。目的:本研究旨在用oct方法鉴别糖尿病性和假性食管性ME (DME和PME)。A: 30只眼睛有DME, B: 20只眼睛有PME。研究对象和方法:两组均进行了全面的临床评估、OCT扫描和数据分析。统计分析方法:采用SPSS v. 16软件进行描述性统计、平均值、极差、标准差分析。均数比较采用学生t检验。采用Pearson相关系数评价变量间的相关性。结果:两组患者最大黄斑厚度和中心黄斑厚度均升高,PME组高于对照组(P = 0.042和P = 0.00001)。PME组黄斑厚度/体积比(TVR)较高(P = 0.00001)。囊性变有不同的分布模式;假性黄斑水肿患者均无神经节细胞层和视网膜神经纤维层,内核层和外核层均受影响(P = 0.0061)。DME组视网膜前膜明显增多(P = 0.0452)。PME组多见穹状黄斑(P = 0.043)。结论:PME与DME具有不同的OCT特征;较高的TVR,圆顶状黄斑,无ERM提示PME,较低的TVR,存在视网膜内囊肿和/或ERM提示DME。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信