IP Traffic Classification for QoS Guarantees: The Independence of Packets

M. Dusi, F. Gringoli, L. Salgarelli
{"title":"IP Traffic Classification for QoS Guarantees: The Independence of Packets","authors":"M. Dusi, F. Gringoli, L. Salgarelli","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN.2008.ECP.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classification of IP flows according to the application that generated them has become a popular research subject in the last few years. Several recent papers based their studies on the analysis of features of flows such as the packet size and inter-arrival time, which are then used as input to classification techniques derived from various scientific areas such as pattern recognition. In this paper we analyze the impact on flow classification of a hypothesis that is often overlooked, i.e., the tenet that the features of consecutive packets of a given IP flow can be considered statistically independent. We compare two approaches, one based on a technique that considers consecutive packets statistically independent, and one that relies on the opposite assumption. These techniques are then applied to three different sets of traffic traces. Experimental results show that while assuming the independence of consecutive packets has relatively few effects on true positives, it can have a significant negative impact on the false positive and true negative rates, therefore lowering the precision of the classification process.","PeriodicalId":314071,"journal":{"name":"2008 Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks","volume":"328 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2008.ECP.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The classification of IP flows according to the application that generated them has become a popular research subject in the last few years. Several recent papers based their studies on the analysis of features of flows such as the packet size and inter-arrival time, which are then used as input to classification techniques derived from various scientific areas such as pattern recognition. In this paper we analyze the impact on flow classification of a hypothesis that is often overlooked, i.e., the tenet that the features of consecutive packets of a given IP flow can be considered statistically independent. We compare two approaches, one based on a technique that considers consecutive packets statistically independent, and one that relies on the opposite assumption. These techniques are then applied to three different sets of traffic traces. Experimental results show that while assuming the independence of consecutive packets has relatively few effects on true positives, it can have a significant negative impact on the false positive and true negative rates, therefore lowering the precision of the classification process.
保证QoS的IP流分类:报文的独立性
根据产生IP流的应用对IP流进行分类已成为近年来的一个热门研究课题。最近的几篇论文基于对信息流特征(如数据包大小和间隔到达时间)的分析,然后将其用作从各种科学领域(如模式识别)衍生的分类技术的输入。在本文中,我们分析了一个经常被忽视的假设对流分类的影响,即一个给定IP流的连续数据包的特征可以被认为是统计独立的原则。我们比较了两种方法,一种基于一种认为连续数据包在统计上是独立的技术,另一种依赖于相反的假设。然后将这些技术应用于三组不同的流量轨迹。实验结果表明,虽然假设连续数据包的独立性对真阳性的影响相对较小,但它会对假阳性和真阴性率产生显著的负面影响,从而降低分类过程的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信