Judging action capabilities in augmented reality

Grant D. Pointon, Chelsey Thompson, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Miti Joshi, Richard A. Paris, Bobby Bodenheimer
{"title":"Judging action capabilities in augmented reality","authors":"Grant D. Pointon, Chelsey Thompson, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Miti Joshi, Richard A. Paris, Bobby Bodenheimer","doi":"10.1145/3225153.3225168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The utility of mediated environments increases when environmental scale (size and distance) is perceived accurately. We present the use of perceived affordances---judgments of action capabilities---as an objective way to assess space perception in an augmented reality (AR) environment. The current study extends the previous use of this methodology in virtual reality (VR) to AR. We tested two locomotion-based affordance tasks. In the first experiment, observers judged whether they could pass through a virtual aperture presented at different widths and distances, and also judged the distance to the aperture. In the second experiment, observers judged whether they could step over a virtual gap on the ground. In both experiments, the virtual objects were displayed with the HoloLens in a real laboratory environment. We demonstrate that affordances for passing through and perceived distance to the aperture are similar in AR to those measured in the real world, but that judgments of gap-crossing in AR were underestimated. These differences across two affordances may result from the different spatial characteristics of the virtual objects (on the ground versus extending off the ground).","PeriodicalId":185507,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3225153.3225168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The utility of mediated environments increases when environmental scale (size and distance) is perceived accurately. We present the use of perceived affordances---judgments of action capabilities---as an objective way to assess space perception in an augmented reality (AR) environment. The current study extends the previous use of this methodology in virtual reality (VR) to AR. We tested two locomotion-based affordance tasks. In the first experiment, observers judged whether they could pass through a virtual aperture presented at different widths and distances, and also judged the distance to the aperture. In the second experiment, observers judged whether they could step over a virtual gap on the ground. In both experiments, the virtual objects were displayed with the HoloLens in a real laboratory environment. We demonstrate that affordances for passing through and perceived distance to the aperture are similar in AR to those measured in the real world, but that judgments of gap-crossing in AR were underestimated. These differences across two affordances may result from the different spatial characteristics of the virtual objects (on the ground versus extending off the ground).
判断增强现实中的行动能力
当环境尺度(大小和距离)被准确感知时,中介环境的效用就会增加。我们提出使用感知可视性——对行动能力的判断——作为一种客观的方法来评估增强现实(AR)环境中的空间感知。目前的研究将该方法在虚拟现实(VR)中的先前使用扩展到AR。我们测试了两个基于运动的功能任务。在第一个实验中,观察者判断他们是否可以通过一个不同宽度和距离的虚拟孔径,并判断到该孔径的距离。在第二个实验中,观察者判断他们是否能跨过地面上的一个虚拟缺口。在这两个实验中,虚拟物体在真实的实验室环境中与HoloLens一起显示。我们证明了在AR中通过和感知到的距离与在现实世界中测量的相似,但是在AR中对间隙交叉的判断被低估了。两种可见性之间的差异可能源于虚拟对象的不同空间特征(在地面上与在地面上延伸)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信