Management Accounting System in Public Healthcare Entities: Evidence from Vietnam

Quang-Huy Ngo
{"title":"Management Accounting System in Public Healthcare Entities: Evidence from Vietnam","authors":"Quang-Huy Ngo","doi":"10.51341/1984-3925_2020V23N3A6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:This study aims to examine the influence of contingency factors as market competition and organizational size on the effectiveness of the management accounting system (MAS) design in Vietnamese public healthcare entities. Method: Data were collected from 165 respondents working in Vietnamese public healthcare entities. PLS-SEM techniques were used to test the proposed model. Besides, the common method bias was assessed by employing the one single factor test and marker variable technique.Results: The results reveal that market competition is positively associated with four characteristics of MAS design as scope, timeliness, integration, and aggregation. The size of healthcare entities only positively correlates with two characteristics as integration and aggregation. All these four characteristics allow an increase in managerial performance.Originality/relevance: A previous study shows that healthcare's managers in Vietnam find MAS information to improve performance in several aspects. However, this study does not indicate whether or not MAS has an impact on managerial performance. Besides, according to contingency theorists, MAS should be designed in line with contextual factors to enhance performance. This study aims to address these gaps.Theoretical/methodological contributions: With respect to the literature on healthcare sectors in Vietnam, this study extends the works of Pomberg et al. (2012) and Fung (2012) by indicating market competition and organizational sizes driving MAS to design more sophisticated in order to improve managerial performance. Besides, this paper contributes to the literature on public sectors by following a suggestion of Van Helden (2005), who urges the researcher should focus more on other management accounting topics than budgeting and performance evaluations, and use survey-based methods in public-sector research. Lastly, this study is the first study examining the impact of contingency factors as the organizational size on the effectiveness of MAS design, which is the assumption of most studies on management accounting.","PeriodicalId":142135,"journal":{"name":"Contabilidade Gestão e Governança","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contabilidade Gestão e Governança","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2020V23N3A6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:This study aims to examine the influence of contingency factors as market competition and organizational size on the effectiveness of the management accounting system (MAS) design in Vietnamese public healthcare entities. Method: Data were collected from 165 respondents working in Vietnamese public healthcare entities. PLS-SEM techniques were used to test the proposed model. Besides, the common method bias was assessed by employing the one single factor test and marker variable technique.Results: The results reveal that market competition is positively associated with four characteristics of MAS design as scope, timeliness, integration, and aggregation. The size of healthcare entities only positively correlates with two characteristics as integration and aggregation. All these four characteristics allow an increase in managerial performance.Originality/relevance: A previous study shows that healthcare's managers in Vietnam find MAS information to improve performance in several aspects. However, this study does not indicate whether or not MAS has an impact on managerial performance. Besides, according to contingency theorists, MAS should be designed in line with contextual factors to enhance performance. This study aims to address these gaps.Theoretical/methodological contributions: With respect to the literature on healthcare sectors in Vietnam, this study extends the works of Pomberg et al. (2012) and Fung (2012) by indicating market competition and organizational sizes driving MAS to design more sophisticated in order to improve managerial performance. Besides, this paper contributes to the literature on public sectors by following a suggestion of Van Helden (2005), who urges the researcher should focus more on other management accounting topics than budgeting and performance evaluations, and use survey-based methods in public-sector research. Lastly, this study is the first study examining the impact of contingency factors as the organizational size on the effectiveness of MAS design, which is the assumption of most studies on management accounting.
公共医疗机构的管理会计制度:来自越南的证据
目的:本研究旨在探讨市场竞争和组织规模等偶然性因素对越南公共医疗机构管理会计制度设计有效性的影响。方法:从165名在越南公共卫生机构工作的受访者中收集数据。利用PLS-SEM技术对该模型进行了验证。此外,采用单因素检验和标记变量技术对常用方法进行偏倚评估。结果:市场竞争与MAS设计的范围、时效性、整合性和聚集性四个特征呈正相关。医疗保健实体的规模仅与整合和聚集两个特征呈正相关。所有这四个特点都有助于提高管理业绩。原创性/相关性:先前的一项研究表明,越南的医疗保健管理人员发现MAS信息可以在几个方面提高绩效。然而,本研究并未表明MAS是否对管理绩效有影响。此外,根据权变理论,MAS应该根据情境因素进行设计,以提高绩效。本研究旨在解决这些差距。理论/方法贡献:关于越南医疗保健部门的文献,本研究扩展了Pomberg等人(2012)和Fung(2012)的作品,表明市场竞争和组织规模推动MAS设计更复杂的,以提高管理绩效。此外,本文通过遵循Van Helden(2005)的建议,对公共部门的文献做出了贡献,Van Helden敦促研究者应该更多地关注其他管理会计主题,而不是预算和绩效评估,并在公共部门的研究中使用基于调查的方法。最后,本研究是第一个考察权变因素作为组织规模对MAS设计有效性影响的研究,这是大多数管理会计研究的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信