Political Representations of Adoption in Australia, 2005–2007

M. Quartly, K. Murphy, D. Cuthbert
{"title":"Political Representations of Adoption in Australia, 2005–2007","authors":"M. Quartly, K. Murphy, D. Cuthbert","doi":"10.1353/ado.2009.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia has one of the lowest rates of adoption in the western world. Adoption is commonly seen as having done more harm than good, with the antidote to that harm being the “romance” of reunion of adopted children, often as adults, with the mothers who relinquished them. In the popular Australian imaginary, the trope of “coming home” has been mobilized with great effect by indigenous Australians to frame their experiences of separation from birth family into institutions of adoption, and this trope has come to characterize adoption in general. This trope registers adoption as invariably entailing loss, removal from roots, and pain. Problematically, the “coming home” trope also idealizes the birth family, occludes the role and experiences of the adoptive family, and perpetuates potentially limiting essentialism in our understandings of “family” and the role of the mother in particular. This article examines the “climate of apology” surrounding understandings of adoption in contemporary Australia and the impact of successive government inquiries: Bringing them Home (1997), Overseas Adoption in Australia(2009) and The Winnable War on Drugs (2009). It analyses and critiques the rhetoric employed to justify state intervention in family life, the state’s understandings of the “best interests of the child” and the class implications of the consequent endorsement of adoption once again as a preferred social and political option.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2009.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Australia has one of the lowest rates of adoption in the western world. Adoption is commonly seen as having done more harm than good, with the antidote to that harm being the “romance” of reunion of adopted children, often as adults, with the mothers who relinquished them. In the popular Australian imaginary, the trope of “coming home” has been mobilized with great effect by indigenous Australians to frame their experiences of separation from birth family into institutions of adoption, and this trope has come to characterize adoption in general. This trope registers adoption as invariably entailing loss, removal from roots, and pain. Problematically, the “coming home” trope also idealizes the birth family, occludes the role and experiences of the adoptive family, and perpetuates potentially limiting essentialism in our understandings of “family” and the role of the mother in particular. This article examines the “climate of apology” surrounding understandings of adoption in contemporary Australia and the impact of successive government inquiries: Bringing them Home (1997), Overseas Adoption in Australia(2009) and The Winnable War on Drugs (2009). It analyses and critiques the rhetoric employed to justify state intervention in family life, the state’s understandings of the “best interests of the child” and the class implications of the consequent endorsement of adoption once again as a preferred social and political option.
2005-2007年澳大利亚收养的政治表现
澳大利亚是西方国家中收养率最低的国家之一。收养通常被视为弊大于利,而解决这种弊的解药是被收养的孩子(通常是成年后)与抛弃他们的母亲团聚的“浪漫”。在流行的澳大利亚人的想象中,“回家”的比喻被土著澳大利亚人动员起来,产生了巨大的影响,将他们与出生家庭分离的经历纳入收养机构,这一比喻已经成为一般收养的特征。这一比喻表明,采用它必然会带来损失、离根和痛苦。问题是,“回家”的比喻也理想化了出生家庭,闭塞了收养家庭的角色和经历,并延续了我们对“家庭”,特别是母亲角色的理解中潜在的限制性本质主义。本文考察了围绕当代澳大利亚对收养的理解的“道歉氛围”,以及连续的政府调查的影响:将他们带回家(1997),澳大利亚的海外收养(2009)和可打赢的毒品战争(2009)。它分析和批评了用来证明国家干预家庭生活的说辞,国家对“儿童最大利益”的理解,以及随后再次将收养作为首选社会和政治选择的认可所带来的阶级影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信