{"title":"How Do European Citizens Form their Views of the EU Public Administration? Exploring the Role of Heuristics","authors":"Jan P. Vogler","doi":"10.1561/113.00000076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complex multi-level governance systems face a variety of challenges. As one of the most prominent multi-level administrative systems, the EU has experienced a legitimacy crisis for several years, with many citizens displaying skeptical or even hostile views of European integration in general and the EU’s central bureaucracy specifically. Although citizens often hold such negative views of the EU public administration, they have almost no direct interactions with or substantive knowledge of this institution. Given these circumstances, we ask: How do individual citizens form their views of the EU bureaucracy? Our theory suggests that citizens frequently use mental shortcuts, specifically the “representativeness heuristic,” to make inferences about the EU’s administrative institutions. Empirically, we focus on the case of Romania and show that perceptions of domestic central and local bureaucracies are a significant predictor of perceptions of EU bureaucracies. These findings have wide-ranging academic and practical-political implications. * Please do not cite or circulate without permission by the author. The most recent version of this paper may be obtained at the following URL: http://www.janvogler.net/EU Public Administration.pdf Acknowledgments Helpful comments have been provided by Tanja Börzel, Nick Clark, Catherine De Vries, Mat McCubbins, Paul Taggart, Simon Usherwood, and Erika van Elsas. Furthermore, I would like to thank participants of presentations at Duke University, MPSA’s annual conference, and Central European University. The Duke University Department of Political Science, Mathew McCubbins, the Mercatus Center, and the Institute for Humane Studies provided generous funding for the data collection.","PeriodicalId":273358,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Complex multi-level governance systems face a variety of challenges. As one of the most prominent multi-level administrative systems, the EU has experienced a legitimacy crisis for several years, with many citizens displaying skeptical or even hostile views of European integration in general and the EU’s central bureaucracy specifically. Although citizens often hold such negative views of the EU public administration, they have almost no direct interactions with or substantive knowledge of this institution. Given these circumstances, we ask: How do individual citizens form their views of the EU bureaucracy? Our theory suggests that citizens frequently use mental shortcuts, specifically the “representativeness heuristic,” to make inferences about the EU’s administrative institutions. Empirically, we focus on the case of Romania and show that perceptions of domestic central and local bureaucracies are a significant predictor of perceptions of EU bureaucracies. These findings have wide-ranging academic and practical-political implications. * Please do not cite or circulate without permission by the author. The most recent version of this paper may be obtained at the following URL: http://www.janvogler.net/EU Public Administration.pdf Acknowledgments Helpful comments have been provided by Tanja Börzel, Nick Clark, Catherine De Vries, Mat McCubbins, Paul Taggart, Simon Usherwood, and Erika van Elsas. Furthermore, I would like to thank participants of presentations at Duke University, MPSA’s annual conference, and Central European University. The Duke University Department of Political Science, Mathew McCubbins, the Mercatus Center, and the Institute for Humane Studies provided generous funding for the data collection.
复杂的多级治理系统面临着各种各样的挑战。作为最突出的多层次行政体系之一,欧盟多年来经历了合法性危机,许多公民对欧洲一体化总体表现出怀疑甚至敌意,特别是对欧盟中央官僚机构。尽管公民经常对欧盟公共行政持这种负面看法,但他们几乎没有与该机构的直接互动或实质性知识。在这种情况下,我们要问:公民个人是如何形成对欧盟官僚机构的看法的?我们的理论表明,公民经常使用思维捷径,特别是“代表性启发式”来推断欧盟的行政机构。从经验上看,我们关注罗马尼亚的情况,并表明对国内中央和地方官僚机构的看法是对欧盟官僚机构看法的重要预测因素。这些发现具有广泛的学术和实际政治意义。*未经作者允许,请勿引用或传播。本文的最新版本可从以下网址获得:http://www.janvogler.net/EU Public Administration.pdf感谢Tanja Börzel、Nick Clark、Catherine De Vries、Mat McCubbins、Paul Taggart、Simon Usherwood和Erika van Elsas提供了有益的评论。此外,我要感谢在杜克大学、MPSA年会和中欧大学做报告的与会者。杜克大学政治科学系、马修·麦卡宾斯、莫卡特斯中心和人文研究所为数据收集提供了慷慨的资金。