Facilitating University Compliance Using Regulatory Policy Incentives

J. Koebel
{"title":"Facilitating University Compliance Using Regulatory Policy Incentives","authors":"J. Koebel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3094497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internal compliance programs have proliferated at colleges and universities in response to the federal government’s regulatory expansion within higher education. Institutions increasingly utilize these programs in order to manage their myriad compliance obligations and the attendant increase in risk. Yet, even properly designed programs possess many areas of potential weakness that hinder their effectiveness. Concurrently, calls for regulatory reform have grown louder. Although several viable options have been proposed and should be taken seriously, none adequately leverage the compliance function so many universities have recently adopted. <br><br>Institutional policies are an inseparable component of an effective compliance program and their status as such justifies their inclusion as a central feature of higher education regulatory reform. In lieu of issuing mere affirmative or prohibitive compliance obligations, Congress and the Department of Education should strategically incentivize the development of university-level policies that address regulated issues in order to encourage the internal collaborative processes that lead to effective compliance outcomes. <br><br>In addition to examining the practical aspects and effects of compliance programs and institutional policies, this Article draws from institutional theory to demonstrate that the higher education sector benefits from the open exchange of policies and best practices among peer institutions. The federal government’s use of regulatory policy incentives or mandates can facilitate this exchange and similar modeling behaviors, which in turn can increase efficiencies at the institutional level. In sum, this Article contends that a legal compliance mandate is more likely to be included within the scope of a university’s compliance program (formal or informal as it may be) and implemented effectively if it takes the form of a policy disclosure obligation originating in statute or regulation.","PeriodicalId":233762,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3094497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Internal compliance programs have proliferated at colleges and universities in response to the federal government’s regulatory expansion within higher education. Institutions increasingly utilize these programs in order to manage their myriad compliance obligations and the attendant increase in risk. Yet, even properly designed programs possess many areas of potential weakness that hinder their effectiveness. Concurrently, calls for regulatory reform have grown louder. Although several viable options have been proposed and should be taken seriously, none adequately leverage the compliance function so many universities have recently adopted.

Institutional policies are an inseparable component of an effective compliance program and their status as such justifies their inclusion as a central feature of higher education regulatory reform. In lieu of issuing mere affirmative or prohibitive compliance obligations, Congress and the Department of Education should strategically incentivize the development of university-level policies that address regulated issues in order to encourage the internal collaborative processes that lead to effective compliance outcomes.

In addition to examining the practical aspects and effects of compliance programs and institutional policies, this Article draws from institutional theory to demonstrate that the higher education sector benefits from the open exchange of policies and best practices among peer institutions. The federal government’s use of regulatory policy incentives or mandates can facilitate this exchange and similar modeling behaviors, which in turn can increase efficiencies at the institutional level. In sum, this Article contends that a legal compliance mandate is more likely to be included within the scope of a university’s compliance program (formal or informal as it may be) and implemented effectively if it takes the form of a policy disclosure obligation originating in statute or regulation.
利用监管政策激励促进大学合规
为了应对联邦政府对高等教育的监管扩张,学院和大学的内部合规计划激增。机构越来越多地利用这些程序来管理他们无数的合规义务和随之而来的风险增加。然而,即使是设计合理的程序也存在许多潜在的弱点,阻碍了它们的有效性。与此同时,要求监管改革的呼声也越来越高。虽然已经提出了几个可行的选择,应该认真对待,但没有一个能充分利用许多大学最近采用的合规功能。制度政策是有效合规计划的一个不可分割的组成部分,它们的地位证明了它们作为高等教育监管改革的核心特征是合理的。国会和教育部不应仅仅发布肯定或禁止的合规义务,而应在战略上激励制定解决监管问题的大学级政策,以鼓励内部协作过程,从而产生有效的合规结果。除了研究合规计划和制度政策的实践方面和效果外,本文还借鉴制度理论来证明高等教育部门受益于同行机构之间政策和最佳实践的公开交流。联邦政府使用监管政策激励或命令可以促进这种交换和类似的建模行为,这反过来又可以提高制度层面的效率。总而言之,本文认为,如果法律合规授权采取源自法规或法规的政策披露义务的形式,则更有可能包括在大学合规计划(正式或非正式)的范围内,并有效实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信