GATS Classification of Digital Services - Does 'The Cloud' Have a Silver Lining?

Ines Willemyns
{"title":"GATS Classification of Digital Services - Does 'The Cloud' Have a Silver Lining?","authors":"Ines Willemyns","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3194676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article removes the ambiguity surrounding the GATS classification of digital services and provides a technical analysis that might guide this (heavily politicized) debate. Digitization principally impacts trade in services, enabling the widespread use of digital services and enabling cross-border supply of services on an unprecedented scale. It is the seemingly new nature of these services that has caused confusion and anxiety among WTO Members. It is therefore worthwhile to take a closer look at what these services entail and whether, from the perspective of the GATS, we are actually dealing with a new phenomenon. First, the concept of digital services is clarified. Second, the classification issue is studied. The classification of digital services within the existing WTO services classification has been contested by some Members, who have claimed that such ‘new’ digital services cannot be classified within the existing framework. This opinion is not shared by the author, as the technologically neutral nature of the GATS allows for all services to be covered by this Agreement. Therefore, the way in which services are supplied should not render the GATS inapplicable. Rather, classification of services within the GATS framework should be based on the function of the services. Third, the article applies the proposed approach for a consistent classification to several contested digital services. It entails a legal analysis of how digital services fit within the scope of the GATS and the existing services classification.","PeriodicalId":103245,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3194676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This article removes the ambiguity surrounding the GATS classification of digital services and provides a technical analysis that might guide this (heavily politicized) debate. Digitization principally impacts trade in services, enabling the widespread use of digital services and enabling cross-border supply of services on an unprecedented scale. It is the seemingly new nature of these services that has caused confusion and anxiety among WTO Members. It is therefore worthwhile to take a closer look at what these services entail and whether, from the perspective of the GATS, we are actually dealing with a new phenomenon. First, the concept of digital services is clarified. Second, the classification issue is studied. The classification of digital services within the existing WTO services classification has been contested by some Members, who have claimed that such ‘new’ digital services cannot be classified within the existing framework. This opinion is not shared by the author, as the technologically neutral nature of the GATS allows for all services to be covered by this Agreement. Therefore, the way in which services are supplied should not render the GATS inapplicable. Rather, classification of services within the GATS framework should be based on the function of the services. Third, the article applies the proposed approach for a consistent classification to several contested digital services. It entails a legal analysis of how digital services fit within the scope of the GATS and the existing services classification.
《服务贸易总协定》数字服务分类——“云”有一线希望吗?
本文消除了围绕GATS数字服务分类的模糊性,并提供了可能指导这场(高度政治化的)辩论的技术分析。数字化主要影响服务贸易,使数字服务得到广泛使用,并使跨境服务供应达到前所未有的规模。正是这些服务的新性质引起了世贸组织成员的困惑和焦虑。因此,有必要更仔细地研究一下这些服务带来了什么,以及从服务贸易总协定的角度来看,我们是否实际上在处理一种新现象。首先,明确了数字服务的概念。其次,对分类问题进行了研究。数字服务在现有世贸组织服务分类中的分类受到一些成员的质疑,他们声称这种“新的”数字服务不能在现有框架内分类。作者不同意这一观点,因为服务贸易总协定的技术中立性质允许本协定涵盖所有服务。因此,提供服务的方式不应使服务贸易总协定不适用。相反,服务总协定框架内的服务分类应以服务的功能为基础。第三,本文将提出的方法应用于几个有争议的数字服务的一致分类。它需要对数字服务如何适应《服务贸易总协定》和现有服务分类的范围进行法律分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信