Exploring the Association between Calling and Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Perception of Meaningful Work

N. Ersoy, Mehmet Peker, M. Giray
{"title":"Exploring the Association between Calling and Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Perception of Meaningful Work","authors":"N. Ersoy, Mehmet Peker, M. Giray","doi":"10.26650/sp2022-1152304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are different conceptualizations of work. Work can be seen as unpleasant but necessary to make a living. It can also be perceived as meaningful and a way to contribute to society. Employees who see their work as important and are motivated to make a difference in society have a sense of “calling”. The perception of a calling pertains to a sense of purpose that includes values and goals oriented to other people, and motivation to work to contribute to the welfare of society. Calling has many individual and organizational benefits; it contributes to well-being and life satisfaction because it provides meaningful goals in life. Research has shown that calling and work engagement are positively related. However, how and why perception of a calling predicts work engagement is under-researched. This research aims to fill this void. Drawing on self-determination theory and work as calling theory, this study examines a model that basic psychological needs satisfaction (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) at work and work meaning sequentially mediate the positive relationship between calling and work engagement. The sample consists of 286 Turkish teachers working in various schools in Turkey. Results showed that there is a positive relationship between calling and work engagement. Autonomy and competence needs satisfaction, but not relatedness needs satisfaction mediated this relationship. Moreover, the calling–work engagement relationship was sequentially mediated by autonomy and relatedness needs satisfaction, and work meaning. Competence needs satisfaction and work meaning, on the other hand, did not significantly mediate the proposed relationships. These results indicate that satisfaction of psychological needs, and work meaning may represent the intermediary processes in the calling–work engagement relationship. The present study provides insights for both teachers and school administrations to understand the relationship between calling and work engagement of teachers. School principals and teachers can employ these findings for the benefit of their organizations.","PeriodicalId":224243,"journal":{"name":"Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/sp2022-1152304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are different conceptualizations of work. Work can be seen as unpleasant but necessary to make a living. It can also be perceived as meaningful and a way to contribute to society. Employees who see their work as important and are motivated to make a difference in society have a sense of “calling”. The perception of a calling pertains to a sense of purpose that includes values and goals oriented to other people, and motivation to work to contribute to the welfare of society. Calling has many individual and organizational benefits; it contributes to well-being and life satisfaction because it provides meaningful goals in life. Research has shown that calling and work engagement are positively related. However, how and why perception of a calling predicts work engagement is under-researched. This research aims to fill this void. Drawing on self-determination theory and work as calling theory, this study examines a model that basic psychological needs satisfaction (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) at work and work meaning sequentially mediate the positive relationship between calling and work engagement. The sample consists of 286 Turkish teachers working in various schools in Turkey. Results showed that there is a positive relationship between calling and work engagement. Autonomy and competence needs satisfaction, but not relatedness needs satisfaction mediated this relationship. Moreover, the calling–work engagement relationship was sequentially mediated by autonomy and relatedness needs satisfaction, and work meaning. Competence needs satisfaction and work meaning, on the other hand, did not significantly mediate the proposed relationships. These results indicate that satisfaction of psychological needs, and work meaning may represent the intermediary processes in the calling–work engagement relationship. The present study provides insights for both teachers and school administrations to understand the relationship between calling and work engagement of teachers. School principals and teachers can employ these findings for the benefit of their organizations.
召唤与工作投入的关系探讨:心理需求满足与工作意义感知的中介作用
工作有不同的概念。工作可以被看作是不愉快的,但却是谋生所必需的。它也可以被认为是有意义的,是为社会做出贡献的一种方式。那些把自己的工作看得很重要,并有动力在社会上有所作为的员工有一种“使命感”。对使命的感知涉及到一种使命感,包括以他人为导向的价值观和目标,以及为社会福利做出贡献的动力。职业召唤对个人和组织都有很多好处;它有助于幸福和生活满意度,因为它为生活提供了有意义的目标。研究表明,打电话和工作投入呈正相关。然而,关于如何以及为什么对使命的感知会预测工作投入的研究还不够充分。这项研究旨在填补这一空白。本研究利用自我决定理论和工作作为召唤理论,探讨了工作中的基本心理需求满足(自主性、能力和相关性)和工作意义依次中介召唤与工作投入之间的正向关系模型。样本包括在土耳其不同学校工作的286名土耳其教师。结果显示,电话呼叫与工作投入之间存在正相关关系。自主性和胜任力需要满足,而亲缘性不需要满足。此外,自主性、关联性、需求满意度和工作意义对召唤-工作投入关系有序贯中介作用。另一方面,能力需求满意度和工作意义对所提出的关系没有显著的中介作用。这些结果表明,心理需求的满足和工作意义可能代表了召唤-工作投入关系的中介过程。本研究为教师和学校管理部门理解教师呼召与工作投入之间的关系提供了启示。学校校长和教师可以利用这些发现为他们的组织谋利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信