{"title":"STUDENTS' PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS BASED ON POLYA'S METHOD AS A CRITERION FOR MEASURING LEARNING RESULTS","authors":"Andi Karlina","doi":"10.35316/alifmatika.2022.v4i2.176-191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe students' mathematical problem-solving ability in solving story problems. The type of research used in this study is qualitative descriptive research. This research was carried out at STKIP Paris Barantai KotaBaru. The research subjects taken were 2 students in semester V with low academic ability. The researcher chose the subject on the grounds that the student had received lecture material related to problem solving and what was found From the scores of the student's middle test and final test results, there were still students who obtained a score below 50.Data collection was carried out using written tests, interviews, and documentation. The results of the research obtained related to the subject's mathematical problem-solving ability are still very lacking, this can be seen from the 4 stages of problem-solving, namely: (1) For the stage of understanding the problem, the two research subjects in the first question seem to still have difficulty in understanding the problem; (2) For the stage of planning a settlement, both subjects apply certain strategies that are not appropriate; (3) For the stage of implementing the plan, there are still errors in the calculation operation process so it is wrong in finding answers; and (4) For the re-examination stage, S1 does not try to carry out this stage, while S2 tries to carry out the re-examination stage even though the answer results obtained are incorrect.","PeriodicalId":192872,"journal":{"name":"Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2022.v4i2.176-191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to describe students' mathematical problem-solving ability in solving story problems. The type of research used in this study is qualitative descriptive research. This research was carried out at STKIP Paris Barantai KotaBaru. The research subjects taken were 2 students in semester V with low academic ability. The researcher chose the subject on the grounds that the student had received lecture material related to problem solving and what was found From the scores of the student's middle test and final test results, there were still students who obtained a score below 50.Data collection was carried out using written tests, interviews, and documentation. The results of the research obtained related to the subject's mathematical problem-solving ability are still very lacking, this can be seen from the 4 stages of problem-solving, namely: (1) For the stage of understanding the problem, the two research subjects in the first question seem to still have difficulty in understanding the problem; (2) For the stage of planning a settlement, both subjects apply certain strategies that are not appropriate; (3) For the stage of implementing the plan, there are still errors in the calculation operation process so it is wrong in finding answers; and (4) For the re-examination stage, S1 does not try to carry out this stage, while S2 tries to carry out the re-examination stage even though the answer results obtained are incorrect.
本研究旨在描述学生在解决故事问题时的数学解题能力。本研究使用的研究类型是定性描述性研究。这项研究是在STKIP Paris Barantai KotaBaru进行的。研究对象为2名第五学期学业能力低下的学生。研究者选择这个课题的理由是,该学生收到了与解决问题相关的讲座材料,以及发现了什么。从该学生的期中考试和期末考试的成绩来看,仍然有学生的成绩低于50分。数据收集采用笔试、访谈和记录的方式进行。所获得的与被试数学解题能力相关的研究结果仍然非常缺乏,这可以从解题的4个阶段看出,即:(1)对于理解问题的阶段,第一个问题中的两个研究被试似乎仍然存在理解问题的困难;(2)在规划和解阶段,双方都采用了不合适的策略;(3)在计划实施阶段,计算操作过程中仍存在错误,寻错答案的;(4)复试阶段,S1不尝试进行复试,S2即使得到的答案结果是错误的,也会尝试进行复试。