Tinjauan Kelengkapan Pengisian Sertifikat Penyebab Kematian di Rumah Sakit Umum H. Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2019

Esraida Simanjuntak, Anggraeini Ginting
{"title":"Tinjauan Kelengkapan Pengisian Sertifikat Penyebab Kematian di Rumah Sakit Umum H. Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2019","authors":"Esraida Simanjuntak, Anggraeini Ginting","doi":"10.31983/jrmik.v2i2.5358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cause of death is all diseases, conditions of illness, or injuries that cause or facilitate death, and accidents or violence that cause such injuries. The cause of death data in the cause of death certificate is used as the main source of hospital mortality data. Quantitative analysis is a review or review of certain parts of the contents of the medical record with the intention of finding specific deficiencies related to recording medical records. Quantitative analysis consists of four components, namely the identification review, important report review, authentication review and record review. The purpose of this research was to determine the percentage of completeness in completing certificates of cause of death. This type of research is a description of the check-list sheet method and observation. The research site was conducted at H. Adam Malik General Hospital in Medan. When the research was conducted in April-May 2019. The population and sample used were data on patient deaths and certificates of cause of death in March. Based on the results of the research, obtained the calculation of the percentage of completeness of the certificate of the cause of death based on an identification review of 40.5%, the completeness based on the important report review of 28.9%, the completeness based on the 98.5% authentication review and the review recording can be read and clear at 85, 5%. The conclusion of this research is that a low percentage of completeness in the identification review and review of the report is important because of the large number of components that must be filled so that it requires more time. The suggestion from this research is that officers should be able to complete the certificate of causes of death completely and clearly.","PeriodicalId":305770,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31983/jrmik.v2i2.5358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The cause of death is all diseases, conditions of illness, or injuries that cause or facilitate death, and accidents or violence that cause such injuries. The cause of death data in the cause of death certificate is used as the main source of hospital mortality data. Quantitative analysis is a review or review of certain parts of the contents of the medical record with the intention of finding specific deficiencies related to recording medical records. Quantitative analysis consists of four components, namely the identification review, important report review, authentication review and record review. The purpose of this research was to determine the percentage of completeness in completing certificates of cause of death. This type of research is a description of the check-list sheet method and observation. The research site was conducted at H. Adam Malik General Hospital in Medan. When the research was conducted in April-May 2019. The population and sample used were data on patient deaths and certificates of cause of death in March. Based on the results of the research, obtained the calculation of the percentage of completeness of the certificate of the cause of death based on an identification review of 40.5%, the completeness based on the important report review of 28.9%, the completeness based on the 98.5% authentication review and the review recording can be read and clear at 85, 5%. The conclusion of this research is that a low percentage of completeness in the identification review and review of the report is important because of the large number of components that must be filled so that it requires more time. The suggestion from this research is that officers should be able to complete the certificate of causes of death completely and clearly.
2019年,位于H. Adam Malik Medan一般医院的完整死亡证明证明
死亡原因是导致或促成死亡的所有疾病、疾病状况或伤害,以及造成此类伤害的事故或暴力。死亡原因证明中的死亡原因数据是医院死亡率数据的主要来源。定量分析是对病历的某些部分内容进行审查或审查,目的是发现与记录病历有关的具体缺陷。定量分析由鉴定评审、重要报告评审、认证评审和记录评审四部分组成。这项研究的目的是确定完成死亡原因证明的完整性百分比。这种类型的研究是一种描述检查表的方法和观察。研究地点在棉兰的H. Adam Malik综合医院进行。这项研究是在2019年4月至5月进行的。所使用的人口和样本是3月份患者死亡和死因证明的数据。根据研究结果,计算得出基于鉴定审查的死因证明完成率为40.5%,基于重要报告审查的完成率为28.9%,基于鉴定审查的完成率为98.5%,审查记录可读清楚的完成率为85.5%。这项研究的结论是,在识别审查和报告审查中,低百分比的完整性是重要的,因为必须填充大量的组件,因此需要更多的时间。这项研究的建议是,官员应该能够完整而清楚地填写死亡原因证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信