Fiscal Stability Rules in Central European Constitutions

Marek Antoš
{"title":"Fiscal Stability Rules in Central European Constitutions","authors":"Marek Antoš","doi":"10.5040/9781474201643.ch-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so called Fiscal Compact signed by 25 out of 27 EU member states requires the states to transpose the treaty’s rules that limit the annual structural deficit and the general government debt “through provisions of binding force and permanent character, preferably constitutional” (Art. 3, §2). While the goal is set, the means are up to respective states, and thus an extraordinary wave of constitutional engineering has been triggered. This paper deals with four countries in Central Europe which have already adopted fiscal stability rules into their law: Germany, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. It describes the rules adopted and demonstrates that despite some similarities, four wholly distinct models of regulation have been used in these countries. These models are further examined and compared, in particular with respect to their substance (numerical, or institutional fiscal rules), criteria used (state debt, overall public debt, state budget deficit, or structural deficit) and enforcement mechanisms created (automatic cut of expenses, vote of non-confidence in the government, veto power of an independent fiscal council, judicial review, etc.). Finally, the models are evaluated both from the perspective of their democratic legitimacy and from the perspective of their expected efficiency, where the paper draws on existing empirical studies of fiscal stability rules enacted in the past.","PeriodicalId":250773,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International & Comparative Law (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International & Comparative Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201643.ch-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The so called Fiscal Compact signed by 25 out of 27 EU member states requires the states to transpose the treaty’s rules that limit the annual structural deficit and the general government debt “through provisions of binding force and permanent character, preferably constitutional” (Art. 3, §2). While the goal is set, the means are up to respective states, and thus an extraordinary wave of constitutional engineering has been triggered. This paper deals with four countries in Central Europe which have already adopted fiscal stability rules into their law: Germany, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. It describes the rules adopted and demonstrates that despite some similarities, four wholly distinct models of regulation have been used in these countries. These models are further examined and compared, in particular with respect to their substance (numerical, or institutional fiscal rules), criteria used (state debt, overall public debt, state budget deficit, or structural deficit) and enforcement mechanisms created (automatic cut of expenses, vote of non-confidence in the government, veto power of an independent fiscal council, judicial review, etc.). Finally, the models are evaluated both from the perspective of their democratic legitimacy and from the perspective of their expected efficiency, where the paper draws on existing empirical studies of fiscal stability rules enacted in the past.
中欧宪法中的财政稳定规则
欧盟27个成员国中有25个国家签署了所谓的《财政契约》(Fiscal Compact),要求各国“通过具有约束力和永久性的条款,最好是宪法性的条款”,改变条约中限制年度结构性赤字和一般政府债务的规定(第3条第2款)。虽然目标已定,但手段取决于各州,因此引发了一场非同寻常的宪法工程浪潮。本文研究的是中欧已经将财政稳定规则纳入其法律的四个国家:德国、匈牙利、波兰和斯洛伐克。它描述了所采用的规则,并表明尽管有一些相似之处,这些国家使用了四种完全不同的监管模式。这些模型被进一步检查和比较,特别是关于它们的实质(数字或制度财政规则),使用的标准(国家债务,总体公共债务,国家预算赤字或结构性赤字)和创建的执行机制(自动削减开支,对政府的不信任投票,独立财政委员会的否决权,司法审查等)。最后,从民主合法性的角度和预期效率的角度对这些模型进行了评估,本文借鉴了对过去制定的财政稳定规则的现有实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信