Challenges in the Corporate Governance Framework of Indian and Chinese Listed Companies: A Comparative Analysis and the Way Forward

Ananya Singh
{"title":"Challenges in the Corporate Governance Framework of Indian and Chinese Listed Companies: A Comparative Analysis and the Way Forward","authors":"Ananya Singh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3741202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this dissertation, I aim to explore the Corporate Governance (CG) regimes of India and China using CG parameters such as board size and composition, board busyness, board committees, board independence and ownership structure. The reason for undertaking this comparative analysis is that in both these countries, changes to their CG framework were made primarily due to globalization as opposed to the internal domestic requirements like it has been observed in countries such as the United States of America (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). I believe that this relative recency of CG reforms in India and China provides a unique opportunity to study the evolution of institutional and legal settings with respect to CG practices and to identify challenges that assume considerable importance to the shareholders of listed companies in both these jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":248519,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Internal Control Systems (Topic)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Internal Control Systems (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this dissertation, I aim to explore the Corporate Governance (CG) regimes of India and China using CG parameters such as board size and composition, board busyness, board committees, board independence and ownership structure. The reason for undertaking this comparative analysis is that in both these countries, changes to their CG framework were made primarily due to globalization as opposed to the internal domestic requirements like it has been observed in countries such as the United States of America (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). I believe that this relative recency of CG reforms in India and China provides a unique opportunity to study the evolution of institutional and legal settings with respect to CG practices and to identify challenges that assume considerable importance to the shareholders of listed companies in both these jurisdictions.
印度和中国上市公司治理框架的挑战:比较分析和未来之路
在本文中,我的目的是探讨印度和中国的公司治理(CG)制度使用CG参数,如董事会规模和组成,董事会的忙碌,董事会委员会,董事会独立性和所有权结构。进行这种比较分析的原因是,在这两个国家,对其CG框架的改变主要是由于全球化,而不是像在美利坚合众国(US)和英国(UK)等国家所观察到的国内需求。我相信,印度和中国相对较近的企业治理改革为研究企业治理实践方面的制度和法律环境的演变提供了一个独特的机会,并确定对这两个司法管辖区的上市公司股东来说相当重要的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信