A Hybrid Stochastic Algorithm with Domain Reduction for Discrete Structural Optimization

Mustafa Al-Bazoon, Jasbir Arora
{"title":"A Hybrid Stochastic Algorithm with Domain Reduction for Discrete Structural Optimization","authors":"Mustafa Al-Bazoon, Jasbir Arora","doi":"10.61263/mjes.v1i2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, many nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithms have been proposed in an effort to develop efficient and robust algorithms. The drawback in most of them is the large number of simulations required to obtain good designs. To reduce the number of structural analyses to reach the best design, a new two-phase algorithm is proposed and evaluated. This hybrid algorithm is based on the well-known Harmony Search (HS) algorithm and recently developed Colliding Bodied Optimization (CBO). HS analyzes and improves one design in every iteration whereas CBO generates and analyzes a new population of designs in every iteration. Based on the observed behavior of these two algorithms, a Hybrid Harmony Search - Colliding Bodies Optimization (HHC) is proposed. The first phase of HHC uses the Improved Harmony Search (IHS) algorithm. A new design domain reduction technique is also incorporated in IHS that dramatically reduces the number of possible combinations of discrete variables. This improves the performance of the IHS algorithm. The second phase uses the Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization (ECBO). ECBO receives final designs from the first phase to enhance them further. This makes the second phase need fewer iterations in comparison with the ECBO alone. The performance of the proposed algorithms is evaluated using some benchmark discrete structural optimization problems, although the method is applicable to continuous-variable problems as well. The results show HHC with design domain reduction to be quite effective, robust, and needs a smaller number of structural analyses to solve optimization problems in comparison with IHS, ECBO, and some other metaheuristic optimization algorithms. HHC with design domain reduction is shown to be quite robust in the sense that different runs for a problem obtain the same final design. In comparison with HIS and ECBO, HHCD reduces the number of structural analyses to find the best design to less than half. This is an important feature that leads to better confidence in the final solution from a single run of the algorithm for a problem.","PeriodicalId":253933,"journal":{"name":"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61263/mjes.v1i2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, many nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithms have been proposed in an effort to develop efficient and robust algorithms. The drawback in most of them is the large number of simulations required to obtain good designs. To reduce the number of structural analyses to reach the best design, a new two-phase algorithm is proposed and evaluated. This hybrid algorithm is based on the well-known Harmony Search (HS) algorithm and recently developed Colliding Bodied Optimization (CBO). HS analyzes and improves one design in every iteration whereas CBO generates and analyzes a new population of designs in every iteration. Based on the observed behavior of these two algorithms, a Hybrid Harmony Search - Colliding Bodies Optimization (HHC) is proposed. The first phase of HHC uses the Improved Harmony Search (IHS) algorithm. A new design domain reduction technique is also incorporated in IHS that dramatically reduces the number of possible combinations of discrete variables. This improves the performance of the IHS algorithm. The second phase uses the Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization (ECBO). ECBO receives final designs from the first phase to enhance them further. This makes the second phase need fewer iterations in comparison with the ECBO alone. The performance of the proposed algorithms is evaluated using some benchmark discrete structural optimization problems, although the method is applicable to continuous-variable problems as well. The results show HHC with design domain reduction to be quite effective, robust, and needs a smaller number of structural analyses to solve optimization problems in comparison with IHS, ECBO, and some other metaheuristic optimization algorithms. HHC with design domain reduction is shown to be quite robust in the sense that different runs for a problem obtain the same final design. In comparison with HIS and ECBO, HHCD reduces the number of structural analyses to find the best design to less than half. This is an important feature that leads to better confidence in the final solution from a single run of the algorithm for a problem.
离散结构优化的混合随机域约简算法
近年来,人们提出了许多受自然启发的元启发式优化算法,以开发高效、鲁棒的算法。它们的缺点是需要大量的模拟才能获得好的设计。为了减少结构分析的次数以达到最佳设计,提出了一种新的两阶段算法并进行了评估。这种混合算法是基于著名的和谐搜索(HS)算法和最近发展起来的碰撞体优化(CBO)算法。HS在每次迭代中分析并改进一个设计,而CBO在每次迭代中生成并分析一个新的设计群体。在此基础上,提出了一种混合和谐搜索-碰撞体优化算法(HHC)。HHC的第一阶段使用改进的和谐搜索(IHS)算法。IHS还采用了一种新的设计域缩减技术,大大减少了离散变量可能组合的数量。这提高了IHS算法的性能。第二阶段采用增强碰撞体优化(Enhanced collision Bodies Optimization, ECBO)。ECBO收到第一阶段的最终设计,以进一步增强它们。与单独的ECBO相比,这使得第二阶段需要更少的迭代。虽然该方法也适用于连续变量问题,但通过一些基准离散结构优化问题对所提算法的性能进行了评估。结果表明,与IHS、ECBO等元启发式优化算法相比,采用设计域约简的HHC算法具有较强的鲁棒性和有效性,且求解优化问题所需的结构分析次数较少。具有设计域缩减的HHC具有相当强的鲁棒性,因为对同一个问题进行不同的运行可以得到相同的最终设计。与HIS和ECBO相比,HHCD将寻找最佳设计的结构分析次数减少到一半以下。这是一个重要的特性,可以提高对单个问题的算法运行的最终解决方案的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信