{"title":"Measuring flow in an interactive tangible touch table environment","authors":"Mark Brown, Matthew Springer","doi":"10.1145/3010915.3011845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User engagement is a highly desired feature of user interfaces, yet it fails to sufficiently articulate the most extreme type of engagement - flow. The measurement of flow in this paper was motivated by action research participation at the initial field test of the \"Preparing for Bushfire\" touch table Tangible User Interface (TUI) (Brown et al. 2015)). It was evident that measuring engagement alone would not adequately describe and quantify the engrossed behaviour demonstrated by the general public participants. A Flow Index was constructed to measure and quantify the level of intense focus. Since no standard Flow Index exists, this paper outlines the development process of the construction of the index, including its mathematical validation. It then shows how the Flow Index was used to assess success or failure of the implemented user interface design that was strategically designed for high engagement. The flow was measured during the TUI \"Preparing for Bushfire\" study using 64 adult members of the general public.","PeriodicalId":309823,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3011845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
User engagement is a highly desired feature of user interfaces, yet it fails to sufficiently articulate the most extreme type of engagement - flow. The measurement of flow in this paper was motivated by action research participation at the initial field test of the "Preparing for Bushfire" touch table Tangible User Interface (TUI) (Brown et al. 2015)). It was evident that measuring engagement alone would not adequately describe and quantify the engrossed behaviour demonstrated by the general public participants. A Flow Index was constructed to measure and quantify the level of intense focus. Since no standard Flow Index exists, this paper outlines the development process of the construction of the index, including its mathematical validation. It then shows how the Flow Index was used to assess success or failure of the implemented user interface design that was strategically designed for high engagement. The flow was measured during the TUI "Preparing for Bushfire" study using 64 adult members of the general public.
用户粘性是用户界面非常需要的功能,但它却不能充分表达最极端的粘性类型——流。本文中流量测量的动机是参与“准备丛林大火”触摸表有形用户界面(TUI)的初始现场测试的行动研究(Brown et al. 2015)。很明显,仅衡量参与度并不能充分描述和量化普通公众参与者所表现出的专注行为。建立血流指数来衡量和量化强聚焦的水平。由于目前还没有标准的流量指数,本文概述了流量指数构建的发展过程,包括流量指数的数学验证。然后展示了如何使用流量指数来评估高粘性用户界面设计的成功或失败。流量是在TUI“为丛林大火做准备”研究期间测量的,研究对象是64名成年公众。