How Do We Measure Trust in Visual Data Communication?

Hamza Elhamdadi, Aimen Gaba, Yea-Seul Kim, Cindy Xiong
{"title":"How Do We Measure Trust in Visual Data Communication?","authors":"Hamza Elhamdadi, Aimen Gaba, Yea-Seul Kim, Cindy Xiong","doi":"10.1109/BELIV57783.2022.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust is fundamental to effective visual data communication between the visualization designer and the reader. Although personal experience and preference influence readers’ trust in visualizations, visualization designers can leverage design techniques to create visualizations that evoke a \"calibrated trust,\" at which readers arrive after critically evaluating the information presented. To systematically understand what drives readers to engage in \"calibrated trust,\" we must first equip ourselves with reliable and valid methods for measuring trust. Computer science and data visualization researchers have not yet reached a consensus on a trust definition or metric, which are essential to building a comprehensive trust model in human-data interaction. On the other hand, social scientists and behavioral economists have developed and perfected metrics that can measure generalized and interpersonal trust, which the visualization community can reference, modify, and adapt for our needs. In this paper, we gather existing methods for evaluating trust from other disciplines and discuss how we might use them to measure, define, and model trust in data visualization research. Specifically, we discuss quantitative surveys from social sciences, trust games from behavioral economics, measuring trust through measuring belief updating, and measuring trust through perceptual methods. We assess the potential issues with these methods and consider how we can systematically apply them to visualization research.","PeriodicalId":299298,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV57783.2022.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Trust is fundamental to effective visual data communication between the visualization designer and the reader. Although personal experience and preference influence readers’ trust in visualizations, visualization designers can leverage design techniques to create visualizations that evoke a "calibrated trust," at which readers arrive after critically evaluating the information presented. To systematically understand what drives readers to engage in "calibrated trust," we must first equip ourselves with reliable and valid methods for measuring trust. Computer science and data visualization researchers have not yet reached a consensus on a trust definition or metric, which are essential to building a comprehensive trust model in human-data interaction. On the other hand, social scientists and behavioral economists have developed and perfected metrics that can measure generalized and interpersonal trust, which the visualization community can reference, modify, and adapt for our needs. In this paper, we gather existing methods for evaluating trust from other disciplines and discuss how we might use them to measure, define, and model trust in data visualization research. Specifically, we discuss quantitative surveys from social sciences, trust games from behavioral economics, measuring trust through measuring belief updating, and measuring trust through perceptual methods. We assess the potential issues with these methods and consider how we can systematically apply them to visualization research.
我们如何衡量视觉数据通信中的信任?
信任是可视化设计者和读者之间有效的可视化数据交流的基础。虽然个人经验和偏好会影响读者对可视化的信任,但可视化设计师可以利用设计技术来创建可视化,以唤起“校准信任”,读者在批判性地评估所呈现的信息后到达。为了系统地理解是什么驱使读者参与“校准信任”,我们必须首先装备自己可靠和有效的方法来衡量信任。计算机科学和数据可视化研究人员尚未就信任定义或度量达成共识,而这对于构建人-数据交互中全面的信任模型至关重要。另一方面,社会科学家和行为经济学家已经开发并完善了衡量广义信任和人际信任的指标,可视化社区可以参考、修改和适应我们的需求。在本文中,我们收集了其他学科评估信任的现有方法,并讨论了如何在数据可视化研究中使用它们来测量、定义和建模信任。具体而言,我们讨论了社会科学的定量调查、行为经济学的信任游戏、通过测量信念更新来测量信任以及通过感知方法来测量信任。我们评估这些方法的潜在问题,并考虑如何系统地将它们应用于可视化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信