Enhancing in-store picking for e-grocery: an empirical-based model

A. Seghezzi, C. Siragusa, R. Mangiaracina
{"title":"Enhancing in-store picking for e-grocery: an empirical-based model","authors":"A. Seghezzi, C. Siragusa, R. Mangiaracina","doi":"10.1108/ijpdlm-01-2021-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper identifies, configures and analyses a solution aimed at increasing the efficiency of in-store picking for e-grocers and combining the traditional store-based option with a warehouse-based logic (creating a back area dedicated to the most required online items).Design/methodology/approachThe adopted methodology is a multi-method approach combining analytical modelling and interviews with practitioners. Interviews were performed with managers, whose collaboration allowed the development and application of an empirically-grounded model, aimed to estimate the performances of the proposed picking solution in its different configurations. Various scenarios are modelled and different policies are evaluated.FindingsThe proposed solution entails time benefits compared to traditional store-based picking for three main reasons: lower travel time (due to the absence of offline customers), lower retrieval time (tied to the more efficient product allocation in the back) and lower time to manage stock-outs (since there are no missing items in the back). Considering the batching policies, order picking is always outperformed by batch and zone picking, as they allow for the reduction of the average travelled distance per order. Conversely, zone picking is more efficient than batch picking when demand volumes are high.Originality/valueFrom an academic perspective, this work proposes a picking solution that combines the store-based and warehouse-based logics (traditionally seen as opposite/alternative choices). From a managerial perspective, it may support the definition of the picking process for traditional grocers that are offering – or aim to offer – e-commerce services to their customers.","PeriodicalId":135362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-01-2021-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis paper identifies, configures and analyses a solution aimed at increasing the efficiency of in-store picking for e-grocers and combining the traditional store-based option with a warehouse-based logic (creating a back area dedicated to the most required online items).Design/methodology/approachThe adopted methodology is a multi-method approach combining analytical modelling and interviews with practitioners. Interviews were performed with managers, whose collaboration allowed the development and application of an empirically-grounded model, aimed to estimate the performances of the proposed picking solution in its different configurations. Various scenarios are modelled and different policies are evaluated.FindingsThe proposed solution entails time benefits compared to traditional store-based picking for three main reasons: lower travel time (due to the absence of offline customers), lower retrieval time (tied to the more efficient product allocation in the back) and lower time to manage stock-outs (since there are no missing items in the back). Considering the batching policies, order picking is always outperformed by batch and zone picking, as they allow for the reduction of the average travelled distance per order. Conversely, zone picking is more efficient than batch picking when demand volumes are high.Originality/valueFrom an academic perspective, this work proposes a picking solution that combines the store-based and warehouse-based logics (traditionally seen as opposite/alternative choices). From a managerial perspective, it may support the definition of the picking process for traditional grocers that are offering – or aim to offer – e-commerce services to their customers.
加强电子杂货的店内挑选:基于经验的模型
本文确定、配置和分析了一个解决方案,旨在提高电子杂货商在店内挑选的效率,并将传统的基于商店的选择与基于仓库的逻辑相结合(创建一个专门用于最需要的在线商品的后台区域)。设计/方法/方法采用的方法是一种多方法的方法,结合分析建模和与实践者的访谈。与管理人员进行访谈,他们的合作允许开发和应用经验基础模型,旨在估计在其不同配置中提出的采摘解决方案的性能。对各种场景进行建模,并评估不同的策略。与传统的基于商店的拣选相比,提出的解决方案带来了时间上的优势,主要有三个原因:更短的旅行时间(由于没有线下客户),更短的检索时间(与后面更有效的产品分配有关)和更短的管理缺货时间(因为后面没有丢失的物品)。考虑到批处理策略,批处理和区域选择总是优于订单选择,因为它们允许减少每个订单的平均旅行距离。相反,当需求量高时,区域采摘比批量采摘更有效。原创性/价值从学术角度来看,这项工作提出了一种采摘解决方案,结合了基于商店和基于仓库的逻辑(传统上被视为相反/替代选择)。从管理的角度来看,它可以支持为客户提供或打算提供电子商务服务的传统杂货商定义挑选过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信