Applying categories of H.V.F. Hegel’s philosophy for cultural study of soviet cinematography of the 20-30's of the 20th century

R. Poleshuk
{"title":"Applying categories of H.V.F. Hegel’s philosophy for cultural study of soviet cinematography of the 20-30's of the 20th century","authors":"R. Poleshuk","doi":"10.34079/2226-2849-2022-12-23-104-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article compares the filmmaking of S. Eisenstein and O. Dovzhenko, from the point of view of Hegelian concepts, including the modern understanding of concrete and abstract unity. The work revealed the cultural content of Hegel's concepts \"spirit of the people\", \"spirit of the time\" and \"spirit of the world\", \"progress\" and \"freedom\", as well as the modern understanding of Hegel's dialectics. The work offers a cinematic context of Hegel's concrete and abstract unity. According to our conclusion, the philosophical context of O. Dovzhenko's filmmaking has fundamental differences from the cinema of S. Eisenstein's school. We came to the conclusion that the philosophy of O. Dovzhenko's films offers the meanings of abstract unity, which determine the evolutionary development of society, with the help of the institution of individual freedom. At the same time, the cinema of the Eisenstein school is limited to a concrete Hegelian unity, which aims to mythologize a certain historical period according to the patterns of Soviet propaganda.","PeriodicalId":145949,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Mariupol State University Series Philosophy culture studies sociology","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Mariupol State University Series Philosophy culture studies sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-2849-2022-12-23-104-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article compares the filmmaking of S. Eisenstein and O. Dovzhenko, from the point of view of Hegelian concepts, including the modern understanding of concrete and abstract unity. The work revealed the cultural content of Hegel's concepts "spirit of the people", "spirit of the time" and "spirit of the world", "progress" and "freedom", as well as the modern understanding of Hegel's dialectics. The work offers a cinematic context of Hegel's concrete and abstract unity. According to our conclusion, the philosophical context of O. Dovzhenko's filmmaking has fundamental differences from the cinema of S. Eisenstein's school. We came to the conclusion that the philosophy of O. Dovzhenko's films offers the meanings of abstract unity, which determine the evolutionary development of society, with the help of the institution of individual freedom. At the same time, the cinema of the Eisenstein school is limited to a concrete Hegelian unity, which aims to mythologize a certain historical period according to the patterns of Soviet propaganda.
黑格尔哲学范畴在20世纪20-30年代苏联电影文化研究中的应用
本文从黑格尔概念的角度对爱森斯坦和多夫真科的电影制作进行比较,包括对具体与抽象统一的现代理解。作品揭示了黑格尔“人民精神”、“时代精神”和“世界精神”、“进步”和“自由”等概念的文化内涵,以及对黑格尔辩证法的现代理解。这部作品提供了黑格尔具体与抽象统一的电影背景。根据我们的结论,O. Dovzhenko的电影创作的哲学语境与S.爱森斯坦学派的电影有着根本的区别。我们得出结论:多夫真科电影的哲学在个体自由制度的帮助下,提供了抽象统一的意义,这种意义决定了社会的进化发展。与此同时,爱森斯坦学派的电影也被局限于一个具体的黑格尔式的统一体,其目的是根据苏联的宣传模式,将某个历史时期神话化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信