The Productivity of Drug Development: A Systematic Review

Takeshi Akiyama, S. Sengoku
{"title":"The Productivity of Drug Development: A Systematic Review","authors":"Takeshi Akiyama, S. Sengoku","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the productivity of research and development (R&D) is crucial for the management of pharmaceutical businesses, and various methods, indicators, and proposals for R&D improvement have been investigated; however, there is no consensus on a unified criteria. To resolve this issue, we present a comprehensive review of previous studies on the topic. Publication databases were searched for all relevant studies related to the following: the pharmaceutical industry, R&D, and productivity; a total of 6,357 publications were obtained. Through in-depth screening, 190 publications were selected and subsequently reviewed. As a result, methods for the evaluation of pharmaceutical R&D were classified into four major approaches: R&D cost, regression analysis, ratio analysis and data envelope analysis (DEA). The characteristics of each of these approaches were examined from the following three perspectives: the pharmaceutical industry-level, company-level, and project-level. Furthermore, several elements were identified that explain the significant decrease in pharmaceutical R&D productivity: the sustainability of a business model; increase in R&D expenditure; effectiveness of outsourcing; size of the company; and premiums and amortization with mergers and acquisition (M&A). By forming an intellectual basis for the evaluation procedures, the present study has contributed to the theory of R&D management and to the practices used in the pharmaceutical industry.","PeriodicalId":390110,"journal":{"name":"2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The evaluation of the productivity of research and development (R&D) is crucial for the management of pharmaceutical businesses, and various methods, indicators, and proposals for R&D improvement have been investigated; however, there is no consensus on a unified criteria. To resolve this issue, we present a comprehensive review of previous studies on the topic. Publication databases were searched for all relevant studies related to the following: the pharmaceutical industry, R&D, and productivity; a total of 6,357 publications were obtained. Through in-depth screening, 190 publications were selected and subsequently reviewed. As a result, methods for the evaluation of pharmaceutical R&D were classified into four major approaches: R&D cost, regression analysis, ratio analysis and data envelope analysis (DEA). The characteristics of each of these approaches were examined from the following three perspectives: the pharmaceutical industry-level, company-level, and project-level. Furthermore, several elements were identified that explain the significant decrease in pharmaceutical R&D productivity: the sustainability of a business model; increase in R&D expenditure; effectiveness of outsourcing; size of the company; and premiums and amortization with mergers and acquisition (M&A). By forming an intellectual basis for the evaluation procedures, the present study has contributed to the theory of R&D management and to the practices used in the pharmaceutical industry.
药物开发的生产力:一个系统的回顾
研究与开发(R&D)生产力的评价对医药企业的管理至关重要,研究了各种改进研发的方法、指标和建议;然而,在统一的标准上没有达成共识。为了解决这一问题,我们对以往的研究进行了全面的回顾。在出版物数据库中检索与以下内容相关的所有相关研究:制药业、研发和生产力;共获得6 357份出版物。通过深入筛选,选出190份出版物并随后加以审查。因此,将药品研发成本评价方法分为研发成本、回归分析、比率分析和数据包络分析(DEA)四大类。从以下三个角度考察了每种方法的特点:制药行业层面、公司层面和项目层面。此外,我们还发现了几个解释制药研发生产率显著下降的因素:商业模式的可持续性;增加研发支出;外包的有效性;公司规模;以及溢价和摊销与并购(M&A)。通过形成评价程序的知识基础,本研究为研发管理理论和制药行业的实践做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信