Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated and Non-Ventilated Patients with COVID-19

F. Laghi, M. Saad, J. Brofman, N. Undevia, H. Shaikh
{"title":"Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated and Non-Ventilated Patients with COVID-19","authors":"F. Laghi, M. Saad, J. Brofman, N. Undevia, H. Shaikh","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and respiratory failure requiring invasive or non-invasive ventilation in acute care hospitals are commonly transferred to long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). Data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients is lacking. Objectives: To describe for the first-time clinical characteristics and outcomes of a cohort of patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure requiring invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation transferred to two Chicago-area LTACHs. Methods: From April 17, 2020 to June 30, 2020, fifteen COVID-19 patients who had been liberated from mechanical ventilation at the acute care hospital were transferred to the LTACHs. These patients were matched with 14 COVID-19 patients transferred to the same LTACHs for weaning from prolonged invasive ventilation. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. Final date of follow-up was December 20, 2020. Results: The median (interquartile range) age of non-mechanically ventilated (non-MV) patients at LTACH admission was 63.0 years (55.0-74.0);7 (46.7%) patients were women and 8 (53.3%) resided in low-income areas. The corresponding values in patients mechanically ventilated (MV) at LTACH admission were 64.0 years (58.0-73.3), 6 (42.9%) women and 8 (57.1%) resided in low-income areas. Race distribution, premorbid functional status (Zubrod score), premorbid clinical characteristics (Charlson Comorbidity Index), and severity of disease at LTACH admission (APACHE II) were equivalent in the two groups of patients. The most common indications for LTACH transfer in the non-MV group were tracheostomy decannulation (60.0%), weaning from high-flow oxygen (40%) and delirium/encephalopathy (33.3%). The corresponding indications in the MV group were weaning from invasive ventilation (100%), prolonged antibiotic therapy (42.9%) and delirium/encephalopathy (14.3%). No patient in the non-MV group required mechanical ventilation during LTACH stay, 7 of 9 (77.8%) with a tracheostomy were decannulated and 1 (6.7%) died. In the MV group, 13 (92.9%) were successfully weaned, and 6 (42.9%) were decannulated and none died. Five (33.3%) patients in the non-MV group and 2 (15.4%, p=0.396) in the MV group were discharged home. The remaining were transferred to a rehabilitation facility, nursing home or acute care hospital. One patient in the MV group remains in the LTACH. Conclusion: Irrespective of mechanical ventilation status at LTACH admission, most COVID-19 patients survived LTACH admission, yet the majority were not discharged home but required ongoing inpatient medical care.","PeriodicalId":388725,"journal":{"name":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and respiratory failure requiring invasive or non-invasive ventilation in acute care hospitals are commonly transferred to long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). Data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients is lacking. Objectives: To describe for the first-time clinical characteristics and outcomes of a cohort of patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure requiring invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation transferred to two Chicago-area LTACHs. Methods: From April 17, 2020 to June 30, 2020, fifteen COVID-19 patients who had been liberated from mechanical ventilation at the acute care hospital were transferred to the LTACHs. These patients were matched with 14 COVID-19 patients transferred to the same LTACHs for weaning from prolonged invasive ventilation. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. Final date of follow-up was December 20, 2020. Results: The median (interquartile range) age of non-mechanically ventilated (non-MV) patients at LTACH admission was 63.0 years (55.0-74.0);7 (46.7%) patients were women and 8 (53.3%) resided in low-income areas. The corresponding values in patients mechanically ventilated (MV) at LTACH admission were 64.0 years (58.0-73.3), 6 (42.9%) women and 8 (57.1%) resided in low-income areas. Race distribution, premorbid functional status (Zubrod score), premorbid clinical characteristics (Charlson Comorbidity Index), and severity of disease at LTACH admission (APACHE II) were equivalent in the two groups of patients. The most common indications for LTACH transfer in the non-MV group were tracheostomy decannulation (60.0%), weaning from high-flow oxygen (40%) and delirium/encephalopathy (33.3%). The corresponding indications in the MV group were weaning from invasive ventilation (100%), prolonged antibiotic therapy (42.9%) and delirium/encephalopathy (14.3%). No patient in the non-MV group required mechanical ventilation during LTACH stay, 7 of 9 (77.8%) with a tracheostomy were decannulated and 1 (6.7%) died. In the MV group, 13 (92.9%) were successfully weaned, and 6 (42.9%) were decannulated and none died. Five (33.3%) patients in the non-MV group and 2 (15.4%, p=0.396) in the MV group were discharged home. The remaining were transferred to a rehabilitation facility, nursing home or acute care hospital. One patient in the MV group remains in the LTACH. Conclusion: Irrespective of mechanical ventilation status at LTACH admission, most COVID-19 patients survived LTACH admission, yet the majority were not discharged home but required ongoing inpatient medical care.
新型冠状病毒肺炎机械通气与非通气患者急性期长期住院疗效分析
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和呼吸衰竭患者在急性护理医院需要有创或无创通气,通常被转移到长期急性护理医院(LTACHs)。这些患者的临床特征和预后数据缺乏。目的:描述一组需要有创或无创机械通气的COVID-19合并呼吸衰竭患者转移到芝加哥地区两家LTACHs的首次临床特征和结果。方法:从2020年4月17日至2020年6月30日,将15例在重症监护医院脱离机械通气的COVID-19患者转至LTACHs。这些患者与14名COVID-19患者相匹配,这些患者被转移到相同的ltacs进行长时间有创通气的脱机。收集并分析了人口统计学、临床和实验室数据。最终随访日期为2020年12月20日。结果:LTACH入院时非机械通气(non-MV)患者年龄中位数(四分位数间距)为63.0岁(55.0 ~ 74.0岁),女性7例(46.7%),低收入地区8例(53.3%)。LTACH入院时机械通气(MV)患者的相应值为64.0岁(58.0 ~ 73.3岁),女性6例(42.9%),低收入地区8例(57.1%)。两组患者的种族分布、病前功能状态(Zubrod评分)、病前临床特征(Charlson共病指数)和LTACH入院时的疾病严重程度(APACHE II)相同。在非mv组中,LTACH转移最常见的适应症是气管切开术(60.0%)、高流量氧脱机(40%)和谵妄/脑病(33.3%)。MV组相应的适应证为脱离有创通气(100%)、延长抗生素治疗(42.9%)和谵妄/脑病(14.3%)。非mv组患者在LTACH停留期间无机械通气需要,9例气管造口患者中有7例(77.8%)脱管,1例(6.7%)死亡。MV组13只(92.9%)断奶成功,6只(42.9%)脱胎,无死亡。非中压组5例(33.3%)出院,中压组2例(15.4%,p=0.396)出院。其余被转移到康复机构、疗养院或急症护理医院。MV组1例患者仍留在LTACH。结论:无论在LTACH入院时机械通气状态如何,大多数COVID-19患者在LTACH入院时存活,但大多数患者未出院,但需要持续住院治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信