Triage Accuracy of Pediatric Patients using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale in Emergency Departments

Sun-Hee Moon, Shin Jae Lan
{"title":"Triage Accuracy of Pediatric Patients using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale in Emergency Departments","authors":"Sun-Hee Moon, Shin Jae Lan","doi":"10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.11.626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This retrospective study investigates the accuracy of triage procedures for pediatric patients in emergency departments (EDs) using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). The study includes 250 randomly selected initial nursing records and clinical outcomes of pediatric patients who visited one regional ED or a local ED from October 2016 to September 2017. The collected data were analyzed by a qualified expert to determine the true triage score. The accuracy of triage was defined as the agreement between the triage score of the emergency nurses (ENs) and the true triage score as determined by the expert. Based on expert comments, the cause of the triage error was analyzed and the KTAS score was compared with the discharge, length of stay (LOS), and medical cost. The results showed that the degree of agreement in the triage score between the experts and the ENs was excellent (weighted kappa=0.77). Among the causes of triage discordance, the most frequent was the incorrect application of vital signs to the KTAS algorithm criteria (n=13). Patients with high severity KTAS levels 1 and 2 were discharged less often (χ = 43.25, p<0.001). There were significant differences in the length of stay (F=12.39, p<0.001) and cost (F=11.78, p<0.001) between KTAS scores when adjusting for age. The results of this study indicate that KTAS is highly accurate in EDs. Hence, the newly developed triage tool is becoming well established in Korea.","PeriodicalId":438644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korea Academia Industrial Cooperation Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korea Academia Industrial Cooperation Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.11.626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This retrospective study investigates the accuracy of triage procedures for pediatric patients in emergency departments (EDs) using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). The study includes 250 randomly selected initial nursing records and clinical outcomes of pediatric patients who visited one regional ED or a local ED from October 2016 to September 2017. The collected data were analyzed by a qualified expert to determine the true triage score. The accuracy of triage was defined as the agreement between the triage score of the emergency nurses (ENs) and the true triage score as determined by the expert. Based on expert comments, the cause of the triage error was analyzed and the KTAS score was compared with the discharge, length of stay (LOS), and medical cost. The results showed that the degree of agreement in the triage score between the experts and the ENs was excellent (weighted kappa=0.77). Among the causes of triage discordance, the most frequent was the incorrect application of vital signs to the KTAS algorithm criteria (n=13). Patients with high severity KTAS levels 1 and 2 were discharged less often (χ = 43.25, p<0.001). There were significant differences in the length of stay (F=12.39, p<0.001) and cost (F=11.78, p<0.001) between KTAS scores when adjusting for age. The results of this study indicate that KTAS is highly accurate in EDs. Hence, the newly developed triage tool is becoming well established in Korea.
急诊科使用韩国分诊法和急诊科分级表的儿科患者分诊准确性
本回顾性研究调查了在急诊科(EDs)使用韩国分诊和敏锐度量表(KTAS)的儿科患者分诊程序的准确性。该研究包括2016年10月至2017年9月期间随机选择的250名在地区急诊科或当地急诊科就诊的儿科患者的初始护理记录和临床结果。收集的数据由合格的专家进行分析,以确定真正的分诊分数。分诊准确性定义为急诊护士(ENs)的分诊评分与专家确定的真实分诊评分之间的一致性。根据专家意见,分析分诊错误的原因,并将KTAS评分与出院、住院时间(LOS)和医疗费用进行比较。结果表明,专家与ENs在分诊评分上的一致性非常好(加权kappa=0.77)。在分类不一致的原因中,最常见的是生命体征对KTAS算法标准的错误应用(n=13)。重度KTAS 1级和2级患者出院次数较少(χ = 43.25, p<0.001)。经年龄调整后,两组住院时间(F=12.39, p<0.001)和费用(F=11.78, p<0.001)差异均有统计学意义。本研究结果表明,KTAS在EDs诊断中具有较高的准确性。因此,新开发的分诊工具在韩国得到了广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信