Judgment Error in Pie Chart Variations

Robert Kosara, Drew Skau
{"title":"Judgment Error in Pie Chart Variations","authors":"Robert Kosara, Drew Skau","doi":"10.2312/eurovisshort.20161167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pie charts and their variants are prevalent in business settings and many other uses, even if they are not popular with the academic community. In a recent study, we found that contrary to general belief, there is no clear evidence that these charts are read based on the central angle. Instead, area and arc length appear to be at least equally important. \n \nIn this paper, we build on that study to test several pie chart variations that are popular in information graphics: exploded pie chart, pie with larger slice, elliptical pie, and square pie (in addition to a regular pie chart used as the baseline). We find that even variants that do not distort central angle cause greater error than regular pie charts. Charts that distort the shape show the highest error. Many of our predictions based on the previous study's results are borne out by this study's findings.","PeriodicalId":224719,"journal":{"name":"Eurographics Conference on Visualization","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurographics Conference on Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort.20161167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Pie charts and their variants are prevalent in business settings and many other uses, even if they are not popular with the academic community. In a recent study, we found that contrary to general belief, there is no clear evidence that these charts are read based on the central angle. Instead, area and arc length appear to be at least equally important. In this paper, we build on that study to test several pie chart variations that are popular in information graphics: exploded pie chart, pie with larger slice, elliptical pie, and square pie (in addition to a regular pie chart used as the baseline). We find that even variants that do not distort central angle cause greater error than regular pie charts. Charts that distort the shape show the highest error. Many of our predictions based on the previous study's results are borne out by this study's findings.
饼图变化中的判断错误
饼状图及其变体在商业环境和许多其他用途中很流行,即使它们在学术界不受欢迎。在最近的一项研究中,我们发现与普遍的看法相反,没有明确的证据表明这些图表是基于中心角度来阅读的。相反,面积和弧长似乎至少同样重要。在本文中,我们以该研究为基础,测试了信息图形中流行的几种饼图变体:爆炸饼图、较大切片的饼图、椭圆饼图和方形饼图(除了用作基线的常规饼图之外)。我们发现,即使不扭曲圆心角的变体也会比常规饼状图产生更大的误差。扭曲形状的图表显示出最大的误差。我们基于先前研究结果的许多预测都被这项研究的发现所证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信