Bed Tricks and Fantasies of Facelessness: All’s Well that Ends Well and Macbeth in the Dark

Devin Byker
{"title":"Bed Tricks and Fantasies of Facelessness: All’s Well that Ends Well and Macbeth in the Dark","authors":"Devin Byker","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shakespeare’s bed tricks hinge on humans without faces. In such dark environs, one is unable to perceive the face of another, and therefore unable to recognize, to acknowledge, or even to deny. But what are the consequences of imagining a faceless human? Out of what desires or temptations might a fantasy of facelessness emerge? Wittgenstein repeatedly drew on the face as a symbol of the interconnected nature of inner experience and outer expression, culminating in his assertion that “The face is the soul of the body.” By saying this, he challenges a particular fantasy of privacy that would seek to see the face as the external machinery of inner feelings. According to such a fantasy, doing away with faces might resolve the threat of duplicity through the erasure of human expression altogether. In this essay, Devin Byker explores how Measure, All’s Well, and Macbeth, through comic and tragic modes, investigate fantasies of facelessness—efforts to disavow the face and thus to alter the demands of human relations. Through such drama, Shakespeare explores both the epistemological and ethical force of the claims of the face and the consequences of a fantasy that wishes to ignore such claims.","PeriodicalId":136313,"journal":{"name":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shakespeare’s bed tricks hinge on humans without faces. In such dark environs, one is unable to perceive the face of another, and therefore unable to recognize, to acknowledge, or even to deny. But what are the consequences of imagining a faceless human? Out of what desires or temptations might a fantasy of facelessness emerge? Wittgenstein repeatedly drew on the face as a symbol of the interconnected nature of inner experience and outer expression, culminating in his assertion that “The face is the soul of the body.” By saying this, he challenges a particular fantasy of privacy that would seek to see the face as the external machinery of inner feelings. According to such a fantasy, doing away with faces might resolve the threat of duplicity through the erasure of human expression altogether. In this essay, Devin Byker explores how Measure, All’s Well, and Macbeth, through comic and tragic modes, investigate fantasies of facelessness—efforts to disavow the face and thus to alter the demands of human relations. Through such drama, Shakespeare explores both the epistemological and ethical force of the claims of the face and the consequences of a fantasy that wishes to ignore such claims.
床上的诡计和无脸的幻想:结局好一切都好和黑暗中的麦克白
莎士比亚的床上把戏依赖于没有脸的人。在这样黑暗的环境中,一个人无法感知另一个人的脸,因此无法识别,承认,甚至否认。但是想象一个没有脸的人会有什么后果呢?从什么欲望或诱惑中可能会出现无面幻想?维特根斯坦反复把脸作为内在体验和外在表达相互联系的象征,并最终断言“脸是身体的灵魂”。通过这样说,他挑战了一种特殊的隐私幻想,这种幻想试图将脸视为内在情感的外部机制。根据这样一种幻想,消除人脸可能会通过完全消除人类的表情来解决表里不一的威胁。在这篇文章中,德文·拜克探讨了《度量》、《一切都好》和《麦克白》是如何通过喜剧和悲剧的模式来探究无脸的幻想——努力否认脸,从而改变人类关系的需求。通过这样的戏剧,莎士比亚探索了认识论和道德力量的主张和幻想的后果,希望忽视这些主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信