Time–Frequency Relationship between Us Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty: Evidence from Historical Data

C. Albulescu, A. Tiwari, S. Miller, Rangan Gupta
{"title":"Time–Frequency Relationship between Us Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty: Evidence from Historical Data","authors":"C. Albulescu, A. Tiwari, S. Miller, Rangan Gupta","doi":"10.1111/sjpe.12207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide new evidence on the relationship between inflation and its uncertainty in the United States on an historical basis, covering the period from 1775 to 2014. First, we use a bounded approach for measuring inflation uncertainty, as proposed by Chan et al. (2013), and compare the results with the Stock and Watson (2007) and Chan (2015) methods. Second, we employ the wavelet methodology to analyze the comovements and causal effects between the two series. Our results provide evidence of a relationship between inflation and its uncertainty that varies across time and frequency. First, we show that in the medium and long runs, the Freidman–Ball hypothesis holds with a bounded measure of uncertainty, while if the Stock and Watson (2007) measure of uncertainty is used, the Cukierman–Meltzer reasoning prevails. Therefore, the findings are sensitive to the way inflation uncertainty is computed. Second, we discover mixed evidence about the inflation–uncertainty nexus in the short run, findings that explain the mixed results reported to date in the empirical literature.","PeriodicalId":360236,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We provide new evidence on the relationship between inflation and its uncertainty in the United States on an historical basis, covering the period from 1775 to 2014. First, we use a bounded approach for measuring inflation uncertainty, as proposed by Chan et al. (2013), and compare the results with the Stock and Watson (2007) and Chan (2015) methods. Second, we employ the wavelet methodology to analyze the comovements and causal effects between the two series. Our results provide evidence of a relationship between inflation and its uncertainty that varies across time and frequency. First, we show that in the medium and long runs, the Freidman–Ball hypothesis holds with a bounded measure of uncertainty, while if the Stock and Watson (2007) measure of uncertainty is used, the Cukierman–Meltzer reasoning prevails. Therefore, the findings are sensitive to the way inflation uncertainty is computed. Second, we discover mixed evidence about the inflation–uncertainty nexus in the short run, findings that explain the mixed results reported to date in the empirical literature.
美国通货膨胀与通货膨胀不确定性的时频关系:来自历史数据的证据
我们在1775年至2014年的历史基础上,为美国通货膨胀与其不确定性之间的关系提供了新的证据。首先,我们使用由Chan等人(2013)提出的有界方法来测量通货膨胀不确定性,并将结果与Stock和Watson(2007)以及Chan(2015)方法进行比较。其次,我们采用小波分析方法分析了两个序列之间的运动和因果关系。我们的结果为暴胀与其不确定性之间的关系提供了证据,这种关系随时间和频率的变化而变化。首先,我们表明,在中期和长期中,弗里德曼-鲍尔假设适用于有限的不确定性度量,而如果使用斯托克和沃森(2007)的不确定性度量,则库克尔曼-梅尔泽推理占上风。因此,研究结果对通货膨胀不确定性的计算方式很敏感。其次,我们发现了短期内通货膨胀与不确定性联系的混合证据,这些发现解释了迄今为止实证文献中报告的混合结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信