Evidence Laws in Sharia and the Impact of Modern Technology and DNA Testing

Souha Korbatieh
{"title":"Evidence Laws in Sharia and the Impact of Modern Technology and DNA Testing","authors":"Souha Korbatieh","doi":"10.55831/ajis.v5i3.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharia has continuously developed since Islam’s inception in the seventh century CE. This article focuses on hudud criminal law evidentiary requirements, particularly adultery, and critically assesses the impact of modern technology on these laws. Many modern Muslim states implementing Sharia or a part of it are struggling to incorporate technological advancements into their criminal evidence rules. In assessing the desirability of updating Sharia proofs, it is established that modern technology can be comfortably incorporated as circumstantial proof in Sharia under the legal concept of ijtihad. Such proof, however, means it cannot be used to prove hudud crimes, such as adultery, which would contravene objectives of Sharia, hudud, and Sharia privacy principles. Consequently, while modern technology can be incorporated within Sharia evidence laws, there are restrictions on its use due to the unique aspects of hudud and its Sharia objectives. \nModern technology, such as DNA testing, may be used as paternity verification at a wife’s request to establish her innocence in li’an cases or to prove paternity under family and civil laws to provide maternal and child welfare rights. A number of modern Muslim jurisdictions are currently grappling with these issues, using creative approaches in combining modern legislation with Sharia principles. \nThis article argues there is no discrepancy between retaining immutable Sharia laws while simultaneously updating other laws and procedures, including the integration of modern technology.","PeriodicalId":178428,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v5i3.303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sharia has continuously developed since Islam’s inception in the seventh century CE. This article focuses on hudud criminal law evidentiary requirements, particularly adultery, and critically assesses the impact of modern technology on these laws. Many modern Muslim states implementing Sharia or a part of it are struggling to incorporate technological advancements into their criminal evidence rules. In assessing the desirability of updating Sharia proofs, it is established that modern technology can be comfortably incorporated as circumstantial proof in Sharia under the legal concept of ijtihad. Such proof, however, means it cannot be used to prove hudud crimes, such as adultery, which would contravene objectives of Sharia, hudud, and Sharia privacy principles. Consequently, while modern technology can be incorporated within Sharia evidence laws, there are restrictions on its use due to the unique aspects of hudud and its Sharia objectives. Modern technology, such as DNA testing, may be used as paternity verification at a wife’s request to establish her innocence in li’an cases or to prove paternity under family and civil laws to provide maternal and child welfare rights. A number of modern Muslim jurisdictions are currently grappling with these issues, using creative approaches in combining modern legislation with Sharia principles. This article argues there is no discrepancy between retaining immutable Sharia laws while simultaneously updating other laws and procedures, including the integration of modern technology.
伊斯兰教法中的证据法以及现代技术和DNA测试的影响
自公元7世纪伊斯兰教诞生以来,伊斯兰教法不断发展。本文着重于伊斯兰刑法的证据要求,特别是通奸,并批判性地评估现代技术对这些法律的影响。许多实施伊斯兰教法或部分实施伊斯兰教法的现代穆斯林国家正在努力将技术进步纳入其刑事证据规则。在评估更新伊斯兰教法证据的可取性时,可以确定的是,在伊智哈德的法律概念下,现代技术可以轻松地作为伊斯兰教法中的间接证据。然而,这样的证据意味着它不能被用来证明伊斯兰教罪行,如通奸,这将违反伊斯兰教法的目标,伊斯兰教法和伊斯兰教法的隐私原则。因此,虽然现代技术可以纳入伊斯兰教法的证据,但由于hudud的独特方面及其伊斯兰教法的目标,它的使用受到限制。在李安案件中,现代技术,如DNA检测,可以被用来根据妻子的要求进行亲子鉴定,以证明她的清白,或者根据家庭和民事法律证明亲子关系,以提供母婴福利权利。许多现代穆斯林司法管辖区目前正在努力解决这些问题,采用创造性的方法将现代立法与伊斯兰教法原则结合起来。本文认为,在保留不变的伊斯兰教法的同时,更新其他法律和程序,包括整合现代技术,这两者之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信