Unreadable: the pictorial side of text elements

M. Jerrentrup
{"title":"Unreadable: the pictorial side of text elements","authors":"M. Jerrentrup","doi":"10.1080/25741136.2022.2039995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Media design knows various ways to combine text and pictorial elements in layouts. This article looks at photographs that are combined with hard-to-read text elements and investigates, whether these text elements are seen as disturbing or confusing or should rather be understood as visual elements similar to meaningful props. Qualitative interviews and a survey were conducted showing the test persons several layouts with and without hard-to-read text elements and asking for their impressions and evaluation on various dimensions such as ‘boring-interesting’, ‘old-fashioned-modern’, and ‘clear-confusing’. It becomes obvious that the Gestalt theory’s fundamental assumption ‘the whole is more than the parts’ also applies in this context, even though these pictures actually violate Gestalt-rules: layouts with hard-to-read text elements were not only perceived as more interesting, but also the literal meaning of the text played a subordinate role compared to the associations evoked by their look.","PeriodicalId":206409,"journal":{"name":"Media Practice and Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Practice and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2022.2039995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Media design knows various ways to combine text and pictorial elements in layouts. This article looks at photographs that are combined with hard-to-read text elements and investigates, whether these text elements are seen as disturbing or confusing or should rather be understood as visual elements similar to meaningful props. Qualitative interviews and a survey were conducted showing the test persons several layouts with and without hard-to-read text elements and asking for their impressions and evaluation on various dimensions such as ‘boring-interesting’, ‘old-fashioned-modern’, and ‘clear-confusing’. It becomes obvious that the Gestalt theory’s fundamental assumption ‘the whole is more than the parts’ also applies in this context, even though these pictures actually violate Gestalt-rules: layouts with hard-to-read text elements were not only perceived as more interesting, but also the literal meaning of the text played a subordinate role compared to the associations evoked by their look.
不可读:文本元素的图形面
媒体设计知道在布局中结合文字和图片元素的各种方法。本文着眼于与难以阅读的文本元素相结合的照片,并调查这些文本元素是否被视为令人不安或令人困惑,或者应该被理解为类似于有意义的道具的视觉元素。进行了定性访谈和调查,向测试人员展示了几种有和没有难以阅读的文本元素的布局,并询问他们在“无聊-有趣”、“老式-现代”和“清晰-混乱”等各个方面的印象和评价。很明显,格式塔理论的基本假设“整体比部分更重要”也适用于这种情况,尽管这些图片实际上违反了格式塔规则:带有难以阅读的文本元素的布局不仅被认为更有趣,而且与它们的外观所引起的联想相比,文本的字面意义也起着次要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信