Anchoring is Not a False-Positive: Maniadis, Tufano, and List's (2014) 'Failure-to-Replicate' is Actually Entirely Consistent with the Original

U. Simonsohn, J. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson
{"title":"Anchoring is Not a False-Positive: Maniadis, Tufano, and List's (2014) 'Failure-to-Replicate' is Actually Entirely Consistent with the Original","authors":"U. Simonsohn, J. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2351926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit a recent failure-to-replicate the finding that arbitrary anchors influence monetary valuations. Though in the replication the point estimate is indeed not significantly different from zero, it is also not significantly different from a sizable effect. This is partially explained by a high share of valuations near $0 in the replication, causing a floor effect and augmenting the impact of rounding error. P-curve analysis of the original paper overwhelmingly rejects the possibility that the evidence for anchoring effects is false-positive..","PeriodicalId":443127,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2351926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

We revisit a recent failure-to-replicate the finding that arbitrary anchors influence monetary valuations. Though in the replication the point estimate is indeed not significantly different from zero, it is also not significantly different from a sizable effect. This is partially explained by a high share of valuations near $0 in the replication, causing a floor effect and augmenting the impact of rounding error. P-curve analysis of the original paper overwhelmingly rejects the possibility that the evidence for anchoring effects is false-positive..
锚定不是假阳性:Maniadis, Tufano和List's (2014)“复制失败”实际上与原始版本完全一致
我们重新审视了最近一项未能复制的发现,即任意锚点影响货币估值。虽然在复制中,点估计值确实与零没有显著差异,但它与相当大的效应也没有显著差异。部分原因是,在重复估值中,接近0美元的估值比例很高,造成底部效应,并扩大了舍入误差的影响。原始论文的p曲线分析压倒性地拒绝了锚定效应的证据是假阳性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信