Measurement of team mental model as a part of a new team usability testing method: A proposed research agenda

Dalma Geszten, Balázs Péter Hámomik, K. Hercegfi
{"title":"Measurement of team mental model as a part of a new team usability testing method: A proposed research agenda","authors":"Dalma Geszten, Balázs Péter Hámomik, K. Hercegfi","doi":"10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2017.8268259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These days, people usually work together in teams because it is believed that people work effectively together. That is why teamwork and different team phenomena are popular research areas in the last few decades. As teamwork became a common form of work, more and more software's aim is to help the team members' collaboration, which creates a special problem in usability testing. There are several usability methods for individual tests, but only a few for groups and teams. We argue that there might be usability problems which only occur in a team situation, so it is necessary to complete individual methods with team methods when testing collaborative software. As a collaborative software aims to help collaboration, it is a highly relevant problem. Therefore, we attempt to create a new empirical team usability testing method. It will fill the above mentioned gap in usability testing methods as it will be an empirical method which helps to better understand the usability problems of collaborative software. This paper proposes research directions to examine how the measurement of team mental model would fit in this new method.","PeriodicalId":212559,"journal":{"name":"2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2017.8268259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

These days, people usually work together in teams because it is believed that people work effectively together. That is why teamwork and different team phenomena are popular research areas in the last few decades. As teamwork became a common form of work, more and more software's aim is to help the team members' collaboration, which creates a special problem in usability testing. There are several usability methods for individual tests, but only a few for groups and teams. We argue that there might be usability problems which only occur in a team situation, so it is necessary to complete individual methods with team methods when testing collaborative software. As a collaborative software aims to help collaboration, it is a highly relevant problem. Therefore, we attempt to create a new empirical team usability testing method. It will fill the above mentioned gap in usability testing methods as it will be an empirical method which helps to better understand the usability problems of collaborative software. This paper proposes research directions to examine how the measurement of team mental model would fit in this new method.
团队心理模型的测量作为一种新的团队可用性测试方法的一部分:一个拟议的研究议程
如今,人们通常在团队中一起工作,因为人们相信人们在一起工作效率很高。这就是为什么在过去的几十年里,团队合作和不同的团队现象是热门的研究领域。随着团队合作成为一种常见的工作形式,越来越多的软件的目标是帮助团队成员的协作,这在可用性测试中产生了一个特殊的问题。有几种可用性方法适用于个人测试,但只有少数几种适用于组和团队。我们认为,可能存在只发生在团队情况下的可用性问题,因此在测试协作软件时,有必要使用团队方法来完成单个方法。由于协作软件的目的是帮助协作,因此这是一个高度相关的问题。因此,我们尝试创建一种新的经验团队可用性测试方法。它将填补上述可用性测试方法的空白,因为它将是一种经验方法,有助于更好地理解协作软件的可用性问题。本文提出了团队心理模型测量如何适应这种新方法的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信