Possible tensions between individual needs and collective treatment methods of substance use disorders and addiction

Yngve Herikstad, Haakon Tuman Falck, Maria Hoel, Anders Dechsling
{"title":"Possible tensions between individual needs and collective treatment methods of substance use disorders and addiction","authors":"Yngve Herikstad, Haakon Tuman Falck, Maria Hoel, Anders Dechsling","doi":"10.7577/njsr.3821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inpatient collective treatment model has strong historical roots in the treatment of people with substance use  disorders in Norway. It focusses on safe and drug-free environments that support growth and development in individuals admitted for treatment, emphasising the community as method idea. However, little is known about how flexiblesuch treatment approaches are when adjusting to individual treatment needs. Here, we explore how such individual treatment needs are safeguarded within the framework of collective inpatient institutional settings by interviewing treatment staff members who hold a bachelor’s degree in social or health sciences (N= 5). The focus of our analysis ison exploring the possible challenges that may occur as a result of competing conflicts between individualised person-centred treatments in institutional settings that aim to build strong communities. Our findings here are summarised in three major themes: (a) individual treatment needs face possible neglect with strong adherence to the treatmentprogramme, (b) too rigid an interpretation of community as method may lead to attributional errors and a possible rejection of the client and (c) the collective paradigm faces important challenges regarding individuals with cognitive deficits. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to shed light on the tensions regarding individualisedperson-centred treatment arrangements within the collective treatment paradigm. Thus, our findings may provide increased awareness and better understanding of this problem and should inform future research questions, as well as professional education and clinical practices. Future research should focus on how to balance individualised treatment within the framework of inpatient collective treatment. In addition, important clinical implications relate to how such individualised person-centred treatment may contribute to better treatment quality and outcomes in programmes applying the community as method idea.","PeriodicalId":207067,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.3821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inpatient collective treatment model has strong historical roots in the treatment of people with substance use  disorders in Norway. It focusses on safe and drug-free environments that support growth and development in individuals admitted for treatment, emphasising the community as method idea. However, little is known about how flexiblesuch treatment approaches are when adjusting to individual treatment needs. Here, we explore how such individual treatment needs are safeguarded within the framework of collective inpatient institutional settings by interviewing treatment staff members who hold a bachelor’s degree in social or health sciences (N= 5). The focus of our analysis ison exploring the possible challenges that may occur as a result of competing conflicts between individualised person-centred treatments in institutional settings that aim to build strong communities. Our findings here are summarised in three major themes: (a) individual treatment needs face possible neglect with strong adherence to the treatmentprogramme, (b) too rigid an interpretation of community as method may lead to attributional errors and a possible rejection of the client and (c) the collective paradigm faces important challenges regarding individuals with cognitive deficits. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to shed light on the tensions regarding individualisedperson-centred treatment arrangements within the collective treatment paradigm. Thus, our findings may provide increased awareness and better understanding of this problem and should inform future research questions, as well as professional education and clinical practices. Future research should focus on how to balance individualised treatment within the framework of inpatient collective treatment. In addition, important clinical implications relate to how such individualised person-centred treatment may contribute to better treatment quality and outcomes in programmes applying the community as method idea.
个体需求与物质使用障碍和成瘾的集体治疗方法之间可能存在的紧张关系
住院病人集体治疗模式在挪威治疗物质使用障碍患者方面具有很强的历史根源。它侧重于安全和无毒的环境,支持接受治疗的个人的成长和发展,强调社区作为方法的想法。然而,对于这种治疗方法在适应个体治疗需求时的灵活性知之甚少。在这里,我们通过采访拥有社会或健康科学学士学位的治疗人员(N= 5),探讨了如何在集体住院机构设置的框架内保障这种个人治疗需求。我们分析的重点是探索在旨在建立强大社区的机构设置中,个性化以人为中心的治疗之间的竞争冲突可能导致的挑战。我们在这里的研究结果总结为三个主要主题:(a)个人治疗需求可能会因强烈坚持治疗方案而被忽视;(b)对社区作为方法的过于严格的解释可能导致归因错误和可能的拒绝客户;(c)集体范式面临着关于认知缺陷个体的重要挑战。据我们所知,这项研究首次揭示了集体治疗范式中以个人为中心的治疗安排的紧张关系。因此,我们的研究结果可能会提高人们对这一问题的认识和更好的理解,并为未来的研究问题、专业教育和临床实践提供信息。未来的研究应关注如何在住院集体治疗的框架内平衡个体化治疗。此外,重要的临床意义涉及到这种个性化的以人为本的治疗如何有助于在应用社区作为方法理念的方案中提高治疗质量和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信