Life in the Law-Thick World: The Legal Resource Landscape for Ordinary Americans

Gillian K. Hadfield, Jamie Heine
{"title":"Life in the Law-Thick World: The Legal Resource Landscape for Ordinary Americans","authors":"Gillian K. Hadfield, Jamie Heine","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2547664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most advanced democracies are thick with law and regulation, rules that structure almost all social and economic relationships. Yet ordinary Americans, unlike their peers in other advanced systems, face this law-thick landscape with relatively few legal resources at their disposal. In this chapter, an updated version of Hadfield Higher Demand Lower Supply? A Comparative Assessment of the Legal Resource Landscape for Ordinary Americans (2009), we document what little data exists on the performance of legal markets for non-corporate clients in the U.S. Our results suggest that while the U.S. has nearly twice as many lawyers as comparable countries on a per capita basis, Americans in fact confront the legal problems of daily life - housing, family, employment, finances, health - with relatively little access to affordable legal help. We begin with a ‘macro’ view, comparing the resources at an aggregate level that are devoted to the legal system in the U.S. as compared to other countries. We find that the U.S. operates with fewer public dollars, judges and even lawyers on a per case basis than other advanced countries. We then consider ‘micro’ data, specifically data on legal needs and use of legal resources, comparing the intensity of legal need and access to legal assistance across countries. Here too we find that Americans experience comparable rates of legal problems but both give up on those problems or manage them without legal help at higher rates than in other advanced countries. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the distinctively restrictive U.S. approach to regulating the legal profession can account for the diminished access to legal help experienced by Americans as compared to those in countries with more open legal markets such as the U.K. and the Netherlands.","PeriodicalId":306856,"journal":{"name":"Economic Inequality & the Law eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Inequality & the Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2547664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Most advanced democracies are thick with law and regulation, rules that structure almost all social and economic relationships. Yet ordinary Americans, unlike their peers in other advanced systems, face this law-thick landscape with relatively few legal resources at their disposal. In this chapter, an updated version of Hadfield Higher Demand Lower Supply? A Comparative Assessment of the Legal Resource Landscape for Ordinary Americans (2009), we document what little data exists on the performance of legal markets for non-corporate clients in the U.S. Our results suggest that while the U.S. has nearly twice as many lawyers as comparable countries on a per capita basis, Americans in fact confront the legal problems of daily life - housing, family, employment, finances, health - with relatively little access to affordable legal help. We begin with a ‘macro’ view, comparing the resources at an aggregate level that are devoted to the legal system in the U.S. as compared to other countries. We find that the U.S. operates with fewer public dollars, judges and even lawyers on a per case basis than other advanced countries. We then consider ‘micro’ data, specifically data on legal needs and use of legal resources, comparing the intensity of legal need and access to legal assistance across countries. Here too we find that Americans experience comparable rates of legal problems but both give up on those problems or manage them without legal help at higher rates than in other advanced countries. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the distinctively restrictive U.S. approach to regulating the legal profession can account for the diminished access to legal help experienced by Americans as compared to those in countries with more open legal markets such as the U.K. and the Netherlands.
法律厚重世界中的生活:普通美国人的法律资源景观
大多数发达的民主国家都有大量的法律和法规,这些规则构成了几乎所有的社会和经济关系。然而,与其他发达国家的同龄人不同,普通美国人面临着这种法律泛滥的局面,可供他们支配的法律资源相对较少。在这一章中,一个更新版本的哈德菲尔德更高的需求更低的供应?在《普通美国人法律资源景观的比较评估》(2009)中,我们记录了美国非公司客户法律市场表现的少量数据。我们的结果表明,尽管美国的人均律师数量几乎是可比国家的两倍,但美国人实际上面临着日常生活中的法律问题——住房、家庭、就业、财务、健康——相对而言,很少有机会获得负担得起的法律帮助。我们从“宏观”角度出发,比较美国与其他国家投入法律体系的总体资源。我们发现,与其他发达国家相比,美国的公共资金、法官甚至律师都更少。然后,我们考虑“微观”数据,特别是关于法律需求和法律资源使用的数据,比较各国法律需求的强度和获得法律援助的机会。在这里,我们也发现,美国人遇到法律问题的比例相当,但无论是放弃这些问题,还是在没有法律帮助的情况下解决这些问题,美国人的比例都高于其他发达国家。本文最后讨论了与英国和荷兰等法律市场更开放的国家相比,美国监管法律职业的独特限制性方法如何导致美国人获得法律帮助的机会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信