{"title":"Advancing the understanding of value in entrepreneurship editorial","authors":"Isla Kapasi, Rebecca Stirzaker","doi":"10.1177/14657503231165280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction By issuing our call for papers on ‘Advancing the Understanding of Value in Entrepreneurship’, we sought to examine heterogeneous perspectives on the varied contributions that entrepreneurship can make to the economy, society, and the individual. In contrast to the focus on (entrepreneurial) value in terms of economic output measures found embedded across different settings including in policy (Smith et al., 2019) and research (Ketchen Jr. et al., 2007), the collection of papers in this Special Issue give a voice to diversity, interrelationships, and context as key components of entrepreneurship and its value. For example, the interplay and heterogeneity of place and space, time, type of entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurs themselves, in the creation and experience of value in different forms are examined. The studies in this Special Issue, therefore, both create and shift knowledge regarding the value(s) being created in and by entrepreneurship. Thefive articles in this Special Issue span contexts, business models, sample groups, andmethodological approaches. These articles examine (a) themotivations of older entrepreneurswith a focus on affective value creation related to family and personal well-being and how these may influence subsequent business model choices made, (b) poverty and the multiple, and unexpected, value(s) of entrepreneurship that may provide a route out of poverty (c) the context-informedmotivations of Indigenous peoples in South America, (d) cultural values and their role in agricultural-based entrepreneurship in rural Scandinavia, and (e) the role of foundational (value) embeddedness in small firm decision making in the creative sector. Consequently, each engagement in entrepreneurship, or ‘entrepreneuring’ as per Hashim and Gaddefors, can be positioned as an ‘opportunity’ to achieve idiosyncratic value (Kapasi et al., 2021). In summary, these papers provide an opportunity to develop the conversation regarding the construct, concept, andmeasurement of ‘value’, thereby enhancing our knowledge on theoretical and empirical understanding of myriad and idiosyncratic value in the entrepreneurship context. Overview of papers The first paper, ‘Affective value creation through business model value decision making’ by Stirzaker et al., explores the motivations of older entrepreneurs with a focus on affective value creation related to family and personal wellbeing and how these may influence subsequent business model choices made. Informed by socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen et al., 1999), a theory that addresses non-economic value creation, the paper reports motivations that prioritise family-based affective value external to the enterprise itself. This is a move away, suggest the authors, from a common understanding on the interaction between business and family as underpinned by a presupposition that the family services the firm and in turn, the firm contributes income and employment to the family. To date, there is little exploration of the family as an influence on the choice to pursue enterprise rather than other types of employment beyond the ‘family business’. The paper contributes new knowledge on the role of value sought in shaping motivations for entrepreneurship and the embedded nature of family and business, as particularly experienced by older entrepreneurs. As such, the paper provides evidence on how older entrepreneurship motivations may be prompted to realise specific age-related affective rewards that make contribution to both personal and family wellbeing. Relatedly, the paper provides evidence of the embedded nature of older entrepreneurship in terms of being a feature of, and contribution to, the improvement of personal wellbeing and family life through business model value decision making related to ongoing operations of older entrepreneurship that is deliberately shaped to make sure affective rewards are protected.","PeriodicalId":126058,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503231165280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction By issuing our call for papers on ‘Advancing the Understanding of Value in Entrepreneurship’, we sought to examine heterogeneous perspectives on the varied contributions that entrepreneurship can make to the economy, society, and the individual. In contrast to the focus on (entrepreneurial) value in terms of economic output measures found embedded across different settings including in policy (Smith et al., 2019) and research (Ketchen Jr. et al., 2007), the collection of papers in this Special Issue give a voice to diversity, interrelationships, and context as key components of entrepreneurship and its value. For example, the interplay and heterogeneity of place and space, time, type of entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurs themselves, in the creation and experience of value in different forms are examined. The studies in this Special Issue, therefore, both create and shift knowledge regarding the value(s) being created in and by entrepreneurship. Thefive articles in this Special Issue span contexts, business models, sample groups, andmethodological approaches. These articles examine (a) themotivations of older entrepreneurswith a focus on affective value creation related to family and personal well-being and how these may influence subsequent business model choices made, (b) poverty and the multiple, and unexpected, value(s) of entrepreneurship that may provide a route out of poverty (c) the context-informedmotivations of Indigenous peoples in South America, (d) cultural values and their role in agricultural-based entrepreneurship in rural Scandinavia, and (e) the role of foundational (value) embeddedness in small firm decision making in the creative sector. Consequently, each engagement in entrepreneurship, or ‘entrepreneuring’ as per Hashim and Gaddefors, can be positioned as an ‘opportunity’ to achieve idiosyncratic value (Kapasi et al., 2021). In summary, these papers provide an opportunity to develop the conversation regarding the construct, concept, andmeasurement of ‘value’, thereby enhancing our knowledge on theoretical and empirical understanding of myriad and idiosyncratic value in the entrepreneurship context. Overview of papers The first paper, ‘Affective value creation through business model value decision making’ by Stirzaker et al., explores the motivations of older entrepreneurs with a focus on affective value creation related to family and personal wellbeing and how these may influence subsequent business model choices made. Informed by socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen et al., 1999), a theory that addresses non-economic value creation, the paper reports motivations that prioritise family-based affective value external to the enterprise itself. This is a move away, suggest the authors, from a common understanding on the interaction between business and family as underpinned by a presupposition that the family services the firm and in turn, the firm contributes income and employment to the family. To date, there is little exploration of the family as an influence on the choice to pursue enterprise rather than other types of employment beyond the ‘family business’. The paper contributes new knowledge on the role of value sought in shaping motivations for entrepreneurship and the embedded nature of family and business, as particularly experienced by older entrepreneurs. As such, the paper provides evidence on how older entrepreneurship motivations may be prompted to realise specific age-related affective rewards that make contribution to both personal and family wellbeing. Relatedly, the paper provides evidence of the embedded nature of older entrepreneurship in terms of being a feature of, and contribution to, the improvement of personal wellbeing and family life through business model value decision making related to ongoing operations of older entrepreneurship that is deliberately shaped to make sure affective rewards are protected.
通过发布关于“推进对创业价值的理解”的论文征集,我们试图从不同的角度审视创业对经济、社会和个人的不同贡献。与在不同环境中(包括政策(Smith等人,2019)和研究(Ketchen Jr.等人,2007)中发现的经济产出指标方面对(创业)价值的关注不同,本期特刊中的论文集对多样性、相互关系和背景作为创业及其价值的关键组成部分发出了声音。例如,在不同形式的价值创造和经验中,考察了地点和空间、时间、创业类型和企业家本身的相互作用和异质性。因此,本期特刊的研究既创造又转移了关于企业家精神和企业家精神所创造的价值的知识。本期特刊的五篇文章涵盖了上下文、商业模式、样本组和方法方法。这些文章研究了(a)老年企业家的动机,重点是与家庭和个人福祉相关的情感价值创造,以及这些动机如何影响随后做出的商业模式选择,(b)贫困以及可能提供摆脱贫困途径的创业的多重和意想不到的价值(c)南美洲土著人民的背景信息动机。(d)文化价值观及其在斯堪的纳维亚农村以农业为基础的创业中的作用,以及(e)基础(价值)嵌入性在创意部门小企业决策中的作用。因此,每次参与创业,或按照Hashim和Gaddefors的说法“创业”,都可以被定位为实现特殊价值的“机会”(Kapasi等人,2021)。总之,这些论文提供了一个机会来发展关于“价值”的结构、概念和测量的对话,从而增强了我们对创业背景下无数和特殊价值的理论和经验理解的知识。第一篇论文,“通过商业模式价值决策的情感价值创造”,由Stirzaker等人撰写,探讨了老年企业家的动机,重点关注与家庭和个人福祉相关的情感价值创造,以及这些价值如何影响随后的商业模式选择。根据社会情感选择理论(Carstensen et al., 1999),一种解决非经济价值创造的理论,该论文报告了优先考虑企业自身外部基于家庭的情感价值的动机。作者认为,这是对企业和家庭之间相互作用的一种普遍理解的一种背离,这种理解是基于这样一种假设,即家庭为企业服务,反过来,企业为家庭贡献收入和就业。迄今为止,很少有人探讨家庭对选择从事企业而不是从事"家族企业"以外的其他类型就业的影响。本文提供了关于价值在塑造创业动机中的作用的新知识,以及家族和企业的内在性质,特别是老年企业家的经验。因此,本文提供的证据表明,年龄较大的创业动机可能会促使人们实现与年龄相关的特定情感回报,从而为个人和家庭福祉做出贡献。与此相关的是,本文提供了证据,证明了老年创业的内在性质,即通过与老年创业的持续运营相关的商业模式价值决策,为改善个人福祉和家庭生活做出了贡献,而老年创业的持续运营是故意塑造的,以确保情感回报得到保护。