Relating Eye Dominance to Neurochemistry in the Human Visual Cortex Using Ultra High Field 7-Tesla MR Spectroscopy

I. B. Ip, C. Lunghi, U. Emir, A. Parker, H. Bridge
{"title":"Relating Eye Dominance to Neurochemistry in the Human Visual Cortex Using Ultra High Field 7-Tesla MR Spectroscopy","authors":"I. B. Ip, C. Lunghi, U. Emir, A. Parker, H. Bridge","doi":"10.1109/IC3D48390.2019.8976001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although our view of the world looks singular, it is combined from each eye’s separate retinal image. If the balanced input between eyes is disrupted during early childhood, visual acuity and stereoscopic depth perception are impaired. This is because one eye dominates over the other, causing a neurological condition called ‘amblyopia’ [1]. In the normal, healthy visual system, the balance between eyes can be determined using various methods to provide a measure of ‘eye dominance’. Eye dominance is the preference for using image from one eye over another [2], suggesting that the visual system applies different weights upon their input. Hence, eye dominance is relevant for understanding the mechanisms underlying binocular vision. As an investigative strategy to understand the binocular visual system in health in disease, we want to characterize eye dominance in the normal visual system. This information can then be used to serve as a baseline to compare to extreme eye dominance in ‘amblyopia’. Specifically, we ask to which degree variations in eye dominance are related to visual cortex concentrations of major excitatory neurotransmitter and metabolite glutamate (‘Glu’) and inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (‘GABA’). Their relationship is formalised as the ‘Glu/GABA’ ratio. 13 participants took part in a 1-h psychophysical experiment to quantify eye dominance and a separate 1.5-h 7-Tesla MRI brain scan to measure hemodynamic and neurochemical responses during visual stimulation. The degree of eye dominance was predicted by the inter-ocular difference in V1 Glu/GABA balance. Stronger eye dominance correlated with an increase in inhibition during dominant relative to non-dominant eye viewing (r = −0.647, p = 0.023). In contrast the hemodynamic response, measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging, did not correlate with eye dominance. Our findings suggest that normally occurring eye dominance is associated with the balance of neurochemicals in the early visual cortex.","PeriodicalId":344706,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3D48390.2019.8976001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although our view of the world looks singular, it is combined from each eye’s separate retinal image. If the balanced input between eyes is disrupted during early childhood, visual acuity and stereoscopic depth perception are impaired. This is because one eye dominates over the other, causing a neurological condition called ‘amblyopia’ [1]. In the normal, healthy visual system, the balance between eyes can be determined using various methods to provide a measure of ‘eye dominance’. Eye dominance is the preference for using image from one eye over another [2], suggesting that the visual system applies different weights upon their input. Hence, eye dominance is relevant for understanding the mechanisms underlying binocular vision. As an investigative strategy to understand the binocular visual system in health in disease, we want to characterize eye dominance in the normal visual system. This information can then be used to serve as a baseline to compare to extreme eye dominance in ‘amblyopia’. Specifically, we ask to which degree variations in eye dominance are related to visual cortex concentrations of major excitatory neurotransmitter and metabolite glutamate (‘Glu’) and inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (‘GABA’). Their relationship is formalised as the ‘Glu/GABA’ ratio. 13 participants took part in a 1-h psychophysical experiment to quantify eye dominance and a separate 1.5-h 7-Tesla MRI brain scan to measure hemodynamic and neurochemical responses during visual stimulation. The degree of eye dominance was predicted by the inter-ocular difference in V1 Glu/GABA balance. Stronger eye dominance correlated with an increase in inhibition during dominant relative to non-dominant eye viewing (r = −0.647, p = 0.023). In contrast the hemodynamic response, measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging, did not correlate with eye dominance. Our findings suggest that normally occurring eye dominance is associated with the balance of neurochemicals in the early visual cortex.
利用超高场7-特斯拉磁共振光谱研究人眼优势与人类视觉皮层神经化学的关系
虽然我们对世界的看法看起来是单一的,但它是由每只眼睛单独的视网膜图像组合而成的。如果在儿童早期眼睛之间的平衡输入被破坏,视觉敏锐度和立体深度感知就会受损。这是因为一只眼睛控制了另一只眼睛,导致了一种称为“弱视”的神经系统疾病[1]。在正常、健康的视觉系统中,眼睛之间的平衡可以通过各种方法来确定,以提供“眼睛优势”的衡量标准。眼优势是对一只眼睛的图像的偏好[2],这表明视觉系统对它们的输入施加了不同的权重。因此,眼优势与理解双眼视觉的机制是相关的。作为一种研究策略来了解健康疾病中的双眼视觉系统,我们想要表征正常视觉系统中的眼优势。这些信息可以用来作为基线,与“弱视”的极端眼睛优势进行比较。具体来说,我们想知道眼睛优势的变化在多大程度上与视觉皮层主要兴奋性神经递质和代谢物谷氨酸(Glu)和抑制性神经递质γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的浓度有关。它们的关系被形式化为“Glu/GABA”比率。13名参与者参加了一个1小时的心理物理实验,以量化眼睛优势,并进行了一个1.5小时的7特斯拉MRI脑部扫描,以测量视觉刺激时的血液动力学和神经化学反应。眼优势程度可通过眼间V1 Glu/GABA平衡差异来预测。相对于非优势眼,更强的优势眼与优势眼观看时的抑制增加相关(r = - 0.647, p = 0.023)。相比之下,用功能性磁共振成像测量的血流动力学反应与眼优势无关。我们的研究结果表明,正常发生的眼优势与早期视觉皮层中神经化学物质的平衡有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信