Consonantal Structures in Phonetics and Phonology

Yong-Chang Heo
{"title":"Consonantal Structures in Phonetics and Phonology","authors":"Yong-Chang Heo","doi":"10.38003/CCSR.1.1-2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to present and compare two different approaches (a phonetic\napproach and a phonological one) for the speech sound systems of natural languages. To\nthis end, this study investigates natural speech sound systems with the consonantal\nsystems of four Slavic languages, Russian, Polish, Czech and Serbian and Croatian, on the\nbasis of phonetic and phonological approaches. In the phonetic approach, the consonant\ninventories of the four Slavic languages are analyzed with the theory of maximal and\nsufficient dispersion and the size principle, together with a frequency-based statistical\napproach. Segmental universals are discussed regarding sound types such as obstruents\nand sonorants. From the phonetic approach, it is shown that Slavic consonant systems\nare very unusual in terms of natural languages. Palatalized sounds in Russian and\naffricates and fricatives in Russian and Polish support that the Slavic consonantal\nsystem is far removed from the general aspect of human languages. On the other hand,\nwith the phonological approach, four of the five feature-based principles proposed by\nClements are employed to reveal the universals of the languages. They are Feature Economy, Marked Feature Avoidance, Robustness and Phonological enhancement. What we\nhave seen is that some unsolved problems from the phonetic approach are explained\nby phonological accounts. The fact that Russian has plenty of segments represented\nby [+palatal] may not be unusual with respect to a feature-based approach. In addition,\nwhile the phonetic approach claims that Slavic languages (in particular, Russian and\nPolish) have different consonantal systems from the general aspect of natural languages\nbecause of the marked segments, the phonological approach accounts for the universals\nof these languages in the light of Robustness and Feature Economy. In short, what we get\nfrom phonetic accounts are language universals, found by frequency-based statistical\napproach while what we get from phonological accounts, using a feature-based approach,\nare linguistic universals.","PeriodicalId":233649,"journal":{"name":"Cross-cultural studies review","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-cultural studies review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38003/CCSR.1.1-2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present and compare two different approaches (a phonetic approach and a phonological one) for the speech sound systems of natural languages. To this end, this study investigates natural speech sound systems with the consonantal systems of four Slavic languages, Russian, Polish, Czech and Serbian and Croatian, on the basis of phonetic and phonological approaches. In the phonetic approach, the consonant inventories of the four Slavic languages are analyzed with the theory of maximal and sufficient dispersion and the size principle, together with a frequency-based statistical approach. Segmental universals are discussed regarding sound types such as obstruents and sonorants. From the phonetic approach, it is shown that Slavic consonant systems are very unusual in terms of natural languages. Palatalized sounds in Russian and affricates and fricatives in Russian and Polish support that the Slavic consonantal system is far removed from the general aspect of human languages. On the other hand, with the phonological approach, four of the five feature-based principles proposed by Clements are employed to reveal the universals of the languages. They are Feature Economy, Marked Feature Avoidance, Robustness and Phonological enhancement. What we have seen is that some unsolved problems from the phonetic approach are explained by phonological accounts. The fact that Russian has plenty of segments represented by [+palatal] may not be unusual with respect to a feature-based approach. In addition, while the phonetic approach claims that Slavic languages (in particular, Russian and Polish) have different consonantal systems from the general aspect of natural languages because of the marked segments, the phonological approach accounts for the universals of these languages in the light of Robustness and Feature Economy. In short, what we get from phonetic accounts are language universals, found by frequency-based statistical approach while what we get from phonological accounts, using a feature-based approach, are linguistic universals.
语音学和音系学中的辅音结构
本研究的目的是提出并比较自然语言语音系统的两种不同方法(语音学方法和音系方法)。为此,本研究在语音和音韵学方法的基础上,研究了四种斯拉夫语言,俄语,波兰语,捷克语,塞尔维亚语和克罗地亚语的辅音系统的自然语音系统。在语音方法中,用最大和充分分散理论和大小原则,结合基于频率的统计方法,分析了四种斯拉夫语言的辅音清单。讨论了诸如阻塞音和辅音之类的声音类型。从语音学的角度来看,斯拉夫语的辅音系统在自然语言中是非常不寻常的。俄语的腭化音,俄语和波兰语的元音和摩擦音都证明斯拉夫辅音系统与人类语言的一般方面相去甚远。另一方面,在音韵学方法中,《要素》提出的五个基于特征的原则中有四个被用来揭示语言的共性。它们是特征经济性、显著特征回避、鲁棒性和语音增强。我们所看到的是,语音方法中一些未解决的问题可以用语音解释。俄语有很多以[+palatal]表示的语段,这一事实对于基于特征的方法来说可能并不罕见。此外,虽然语音方法声称斯拉夫语言(特别是俄语和波兰语)由于标记的片段而与自然语言的一般方面具有不同的辅音系统,但语音方法根据鲁棒性和特征经济解释了这些语言的普遍性。简而言之,我们从语音记录中得到的是语言共相,通过基于频率的统计方法发现,而我们从语音记录中得到的是语言共相,使用基于特征的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信