Formulating Well-Written Clinical Practice Questions and Research Questions

Natalie Bermudez
{"title":"Formulating Well-Written Clinical Practice Questions and Research Questions","authors":"Natalie Bermudez","doi":"10.55481/2578-3750.1113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incorporation of evidence-based practices (EBP) to provide the best patient care is an expectation in nursing (Polit & Beck, 2021). New knowledge (evidence generated through nursing research) and translation of the evidence using EBP models align with this expectation. Recent evidence suggests EBP/research education and training have positive impacts on nurses’ attitudes, beliefs, and use of EBP and participation in research (Black et al., 2019; Cardoso et al., 2021; Duffy et al., 2016; Engerelli & Belirlenmesi, 2019; Keib et al., 2017; Koota et al., 2020; Rholdon et al., 2021). Furthermore, nurses’ involvement in research studies beyond participation as data collectors provides hands-on learning opportunities thereby increasing knowledge and encouraging positive attitudes towards EBP and research (Fowler & Brown, 2020; Wentland & Hinderer, 2020). While hands-on learning provides an opportunity to apply knowledge, a foundation of EBP and research knowledge is needed before execution or application. A literature search revealed no articles that addressed two-fold education on both clinical practice questions and research questions to provide sideby-side comparisons of the two methods of inquiry and guidance for writing well-written questions. As such, the objectives of this article are to provide:","PeriodicalId":135706,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55481/2578-3750.1113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Incorporation of evidence-based practices (EBP) to provide the best patient care is an expectation in nursing (Polit & Beck, 2021). New knowledge (evidence generated through nursing research) and translation of the evidence using EBP models align with this expectation. Recent evidence suggests EBP/research education and training have positive impacts on nurses’ attitudes, beliefs, and use of EBP and participation in research (Black et al., 2019; Cardoso et al., 2021; Duffy et al., 2016; Engerelli & Belirlenmesi, 2019; Keib et al., 2017; Koota et al., 2020; Rholdon et al., 2021). Furthermore, nurses’ involvement in research studies beyond participation as data collectors provides hands-on learning opportunities thereby increasing knowledge and encouraging positive attitudes towards EBP and research (Fowler & Brown, 2020; Wentland & Hinderer, 2020). While hands-on learning provides an opportunity to apply knowledge, a foundation of EBP and research knowledge is needed before execution or application. A literature search revealed no articles that addressed two-fold education on both clinical practice questions and research questions to provide sideby-side comparisons of the two methods of inquiry and guidance for writing well-written questions. As such, the objectives of this article are to provide:
制定良好的书面临床实践问题和研究问题
结合循证实践(EBP)提供最佳的患者护理是护理的期望(Polit & Beck, 2021)。新知识(通过护理研究产生的证据)和使用EBP模型的证据翻译符合这一期望。最近的证据表明,EBP/研究教育和培训对护士的态度、信念、使用EBP和参与研究有积极影响(Black等人,2019;Cardoso et al., 2021;Duffy等人,2016;Engerelli & Belirlenmesi, 2019;Keib et al., 2017;Koota et al., 2020;Rholdon et al., 2021)。此外,除了作为数据收集者参与研究之外,护士参与研究提供了实践学习机会,从而增加了知识并鼓励对EBP和研究的积极态度(Fowler & Brown, 2020;Wentland & Hinderer, 2020)。虽然动手学习提供了一个应用知识的机会,但在执行或应用之前,需要有EBP和研究知识的基础。文献检索显示,没有文章涉及临床实践问题和研究问题的双重教育,以提供两种探究方法的侧面比较和写作良好问题的指导。因此,本文的目标是提供:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信