"We don't need no self-assessment or concurrent engineering...and no collaboration either!"

D. Brown
{"title":"\"We don't need no self-assessment or concurrent engineering...and no collaboration either!\"","authors":"D. Brown","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1998.653530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews self-assessment survey approaches developed over the past six years as a management and consulting toolkit. The survey provides a common language across disciplines within an organization, as well as between that organization and an external consulting group. What is more, the toolkit acts as a staffing filter, ensuring that the most suitable staff resources address the most urgent priorities. This approach serves to shape and challenge the common assumptions and attitudes that often thwart long term business success. Brief comments on the typical limits of corporate strategic planning illustrate the benefits of a constructive skepticism in reconsidering widely held perceptions. Considering overall responses from nearly 200 participants with 98 corporate divisions, the participants generally rate themselves highly for competitive strategic planning, followed by process management and organizational approaches. Fulfillment declines in the last two categories-Methodologies & Techniques, and Technology and Tools.","PeriodicalId":275301,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1998.653530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper reviews self-assessment survey approaches developed over the past six years as a management and consulting toolkit. The survey provides a common language across disciplines within an organization, as well as between that organization and an external consulting group. What is more, the toolkit acts as a staffing filter, ensuring that the most suitable staff resources address the most urgent priorities. This approach serves to shape and challenge the common assumptions and attitudes that often thwart long term business success. Brief comments on the typical limits of corporate strategic planning illustrate the benefits of a constructive skepticism in reconsidering widely held perceptions. Considering overall responses from nearly 200 participants with 98 corporate divisions, the participants generally rate themselves highly for competitive strategic planning, followed by process management and organizational approaches. Fulfillment declines in the last two categories-Methodologies & Techniques, and Technology and Tools.
“我们不需要自我评估或并行工程……也没有合作!”
本文回顾了过去六年来作为管理和咨询工具包开发的自我评估调查方法。该调查提供了一种跨组织内部规程的通用语言,以及该组织与外部咨询小组之间的通用语言。更重要的是,该工具包充当人员配置过滤器,确保最合适的人员资源处理最紧迫的优先事项。这种方法有助于塑造和挑战通常阻碍长期业务成功的常见假设和态度。对公司战略规划的典型限制的简短评论说明了在重新考虑广泛持有的看法时建设性怀疑的好处。考虑到来自98个公司部门的近200名参与者的总体反馈,参与者普遍认为自己在竞争性战略规划方面得分很高,其次是流程管理和组织方法。最后两类——方法论和技术,以及技术和工具——的满意度下降了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信