Loss of coordination in a competitive supply chain with pre-orders and endogenous pricing

G. Perakis, Wei Sun
{"title":"Loss of coordination in a competitive supply chain with pre-orders and endogenous pricing","authors":"G. Perakis, Wei Sun","doi":"10.1145/1807406.1807501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we investigate a two-tier supply chain in which there is a supplier offering price-only contracts to several retailers who face stochastic demand. Each retailer has to determine his price before taking pre -orders and his demand depends on the prices of all retailers in the market. We assume the expected demand function is affine. We analyze two scenarios when retailers compete with substitutes or complements. In contrast to most existing literature which typically assumes symmetric retailers with a homogeneous product, we study asymmetric price-setting retailers with differentiated products. We derive tight upper and lower bounds on the profit loss due to lack of coordination in the supply chain. Our results show that when retailers compete with substitutes, horizontal competition among retailers compensates the double marginalization effect and promotes efficiency. Furthermore, the loss of profit in the decentralized setting is no more than 25% of the optimal profit in the centralized setting. This implies that in a substitutable product market, there is limited room for improvement from more elaborate contracts, which are often costly to implement. The opposite happens for complements, where horizontal competition aggravates the double marginalization effect and further deteriorates the chain-wide efficiency. It suggests that large profit gains can be achieved through more complex contracts which coordinate the chain.","PeriodicalId":142982,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1807406.1807501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we investigate a two-tier supply chain in which there is a supplier offering price-only contracts to several retailers who face stochastic demand. Each retailer has to determine his price before taking pre -orders and his demand depends on the prices of all retailers in the market. We assume the expected demand function is affine. We analyze two scenarios when retailers compete with substitutes or complements. In contrast to most existing literature which typically assumes symmetric retailers with a homogeneous product, we study asymmetric price-setting retailers with differentiated products. We derive tight upper and lower bounds on the profit loss due to lack of coordination in the supply chain. Our results show that when retailers compete with substitutes, horizontal competition among retailers compensates the double marginalization effect and promotes efficiency. Furthermore, the loss of profit in the decentralized setting is no more than 25% of the optimal profit in the centralized setting. This implies that in a substitutable product market, there is limited room for improvement from more elaborate contracts, which are often costly to implement. The opposite happens for complements, where horizontal competition aggravates the double marginalization effect and further deteriorates the chain-wide efficiency. It suggests that large profit gains can be achieved through more complex contracts which coordinate the chain.
在具有预购和内生定价的竞争性供应链中失去协调
在这项工作中,我们研究了一个双层供应链,其中有一个供应商向几个面临随机需求的零售商提供只提供价格的合同。每个零售商必须在接受预订前确定自己的价格,而他的需求取决于市场上所有零售商的价格。我们假设期望需求函数是仿射的。我们分析了零售商与替代品或互补商竞争的两种情况。与大多数现有文献通常假设具有同质产品的对称零售商相反,我们研究具有差异化产品的不对称定价零售商。我们得到了由于供应链缺乏协调而造成的利润损失的严格上限和下限。研究结果表明,当零售商与替代品竞争时,零售商之间的横向竞争补偿了双重边缘化效应,提高了效率。此外,分散环境下的利润损失不超过集中环境下最优利润的25%。这意味着,在可替代产品市场中,从更详细的合同改进的空间有限,这些合同的执行往往代价高昂。互补企业则相反,横向竞争加剧了双重边缘化效应,进一步降低了全链效率。这表明,通过协调链条的更复杂的合约,可以获得更大的利润收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信