Assessing the Assessing the Efficiency of Takaful and Insurance Companies in Emerging Markets

Spring 2023 Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.54183/jssr.v3i2.292
M. Furqan, M. Ramzan, B. Ullah, M. Hayat, Jawad Khalil, Muhammad Aqib Shafiq
{"title":"Assessing the Assessing the Efficiency of Takaful and Insurance Companies in Emerging Markets","authors":"M. Furqan, M. Ramzan, B. Ullah, M. Hayat, Jawad Khalil, Muhammad Aqib Shafiq","doi":"10.54183/jssr.v3i2.292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted to compare and contrast the effectiveness of Takaful and Conventional insurance providers in developing markets like Pakistan. This was achieved by collecting and analyzing information from the databases of four Takaful and four traditional insurance providers covering 2012-2018. The technical, cost and allocative efficiencies were determined using data envelopment analysis. Total assets and employee count were inputs, while investment income, net premium revenue, and other income were measured as outcomes. Labour and asset costs were included in determining profitability. As of 2012, Pakistan's Takaful insurance sector was considered extremely technically efficient. Conventional insurance companies were more technically efficient than Takaful insurance companies throughout the review period, with an average technical efficiency score of 0.890 compared to 0.730 for Takaful insurance companies. Pak-Qatar General Takaful was found to be the most technically efficient (0.855), Pak-Qatar Family Takaful most allocative (0.703) and cost-efficient (0.597) among all Takaful insurance firms in Pakistan. On average the technical efficiency score is 0.810, allocative efficiency 0.490 and cost efficiency 0.407. Tobit regression estimates found that investment income, size of the firm and number of employees significantly affects the efficiency scores of insurance companies. Based on the above discussion the researcher concludes that conventional and Takaful insurance companies require to improve their technical, allocative and cost efficiencies.","PeriodicalId":305127,"journal":{"name":"Spring 2023","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spring 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research was conducted to compare and contrast the effectiveness of Takaful and Conventional insurance providers in developing markets like Pakistan. This was achieved by collecting and analyzing information from the databases of four Takaful and four traditional insurance providers covering 2012-2018. The technical, cost and allocative efficiencies were determined using data envelopment analysis. Total assets and employee count were inputs, while investment income, net premium revenue, and other income were measured as outcomes. Labour and asset costs were included in determining profitability. As of 2012, Pakistan's Takaful insurance sector was considered extremely technically efficient. Conventional insurance companies were more technically efficient than Takaful insurance companies throughout the review period, with an average technical efficiency score of 0.890 compared to 0.730 for Takaful insurance companies. Pak-Qatar General Takaful was found to be the most technically efficient (0.855), Pak-Qatar Family Takaful most allocative (0.703) and cost-efficient (0.597) among all Takaful insurance firms in Pakistan. On average the technical efficiency score is 0.810, allocative efficiency 0.490 and cost efficiency 0.407. Tobit regression estimates found that investment income, size of the firm and number of employees significantly affects the efficiency scores of insurance companies. Based on the above discussion the researcher concludes that conventional and Takaful insurance companies require to improve their technical, allocative and cost efficiencies.
评估新兴市场中保险公司和保险公司的效率
这项研究是为了比较和对比伊斯兰保险公司和传统保险公司在巴基斯坦等发展中市场的有效性。这是通过从四家回教保险公司和四家传统保险公司的数据库收集和分析2012-2018年的信息来实现的。利用数据包络分析确定了技术、成本和配置效率。总资产和员工数量是投入,而投资收入、净保费收入和其他收入作为产出来衡量。在确定盈利能力时包括了劳动力和资产成本。截至2012年,巴基斯坦的回教保险行业被认为在技术上非常高效。在整个审查期间,传统保险公司的技术效率高于回教保险公司,其平均技术效率得分为0.890,而回教保险公司的平均技术效率得分为0.730。在巴基斯坦所有回教保险公司中,巴基斯坦-卡塔尔通用回教保险的技术效率最高(0.855),巴基斯坦-卡塔尔家庭回教保险的配置效率最高(0.703),成本效率最高(0.597)。技术效率平均得分为0.810,配置效率平均得分为0.490,成本效率平均得分为0.407。Tobit回归估计发现,投资收益、公司规模和员工数量显著影响保险公司的效率得分。基于上述讨论,研究者得出结论,传统保险公司和回教保险公司需要提高其技术效率、配置效率和成本效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信