“Ownself Check Ownself”: The Role of Singlish Humor in the Rise of the Opposition Politician in Singapore

Velda Khoo
{"title":"“Ownself Check Ownself”: The Role of Singlish Humor in the Rise of the Opposition Politician in Singapore","authors":"Velda Khoo","doi":"10.33011/CRIL.24.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The People’s Action Party (PAP) have won every election in Singapore since 1959 when the citystate was first granted self-governance. Over the years, its regime has been described as authoritarian by political observers (Rodan 2004; Tan 2012), the subjugation of the media a commonly brought-up example of the party’s ability to shut down contrasting political views (Seow,1998). With media laws that dictate the freedom of the press and protect the PAP’s interests, opposition parties have found it difficult to break their stronghold on the nation-state, and there has been no real political contestation in the general elections. Since 2011 however, the PAP, amidst social pressure to ‘keep up with the times’, have cautiously lifted the total ban on online campaigning and as a result, Singapore politics have undergone rapid mediatization. This has led to two major changes in the local political arena. Firstly, the shift in symbiotic relationships between the mainstream media, political organizations and the electorate in Singapore, has encouraged the paralleled rise of \"newly competitive\" opposition parties able to capitalize on newer, non-traditional spaces of communication to question the ruling legitimacy of the PAP (Ortmann, 2010). In order to brand themselves as alternative voices to an elite PAP, their public performances have appealed to growing populism, and tap on Singlish, an ideologically valuable linguistic resource, to do so. This paper analyzes the creative, patterned use of Singlish, indexically tied to \"the common Singaporean\" (J. Leimgruber, 2013), by opposition politicians in rallies to humorously attack PAP candidates and ideas. I argue that such linked uses of humor to language allow for opposition politicians to simultaneously position themselves as fellow lay members of the Singaporean community, and reinforce their own political stances through the deriding of the ruling party. Secondly, the rise of social media and alternative new media on the Internet have created an increasingly sophisticated citizenry (cf. Mazzoleni and Schulz, 1999) that exhibit greater degrees of \"open political dissent\" (Ortmann, 2010) and scrutinize political actors closer than before. This paper tracks online Singlish memes in which Singaporean netizens mock the PAP’s ’inauthentic’ expressions of Singaporean-ness and legitimize opposition politicians’ use of the language. As such, an alternative linguistic marketplace (Bourdieu, 1977) emerges in which Singlish humor is a symbol of populist resistance and solidarity. Through the analysis of these metalinguistic commentaries, I make a case for the commodification of Singlish as an ideological resource through which Singaporeans construct intersubjectivity and discuss how the nation-state is aligned with certain ways of using language.","PeriodicalId":403389,"journal":{"name":"Colorado Research in Linguistics","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorado Research in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33011/CRIL.24.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The People’s Action Party (PAP) have won every election in Singapore since 1959 when the citystate was first granted self-governance. Over the years, its regime has been described as authoritarian by political observers (Rodan 2004; Tan 2012), the subjugation of the media a commonly brought-up example of the party’s ability to shut down contrasting political views (Seow,1998). With media laws that dictate the freedom of the press and protect the PAP’s interests, opposition parties have found it difficult to break their stronghold on the nation-state, and there has been no real political contestation in the general elections. Since 2011 however, the PAP, amidst social pressure to ‘keep up with the times’, have cautiously lifted the total ban on online campaigning and as a result, Singapore politics have undergone rapid mediatization. This has led to two major changes in the local political arena. Firstly, the shift in symbiotic relationships between the mainstream media, political organizations and the electorate in Singapore, has encouraged the paralleled rise of "newly competitive" opposition parties able to capitalize on newer, non-traditional spaces of communication to question the ruling legitimacy of the PAP (Ortmann, 2010). In order to brand themselves as alternative voices to an elite PAP, their public performances have appealed to growing populism, and tap on Singlish, an ideologically valuable linguistic resource, to do so. This paper analyzes the creative, patterned use of Singlish, indexically tied to "the common Singaporean" (J. Leimgruber, 2013), by opposition politicians in rallies to humorously attack PAP candidates and ideas. I argue that such linked uses of humor to language allow for opposition politicians to simultaneously position themselves as fellow lay members of the Singaporean community, and reinforce their own political stances through the deriding of the ruling party. Secondly, the rise of social media and alternative new media on the Internet have created an increasingly sophisticated citizenry (cf. Mazzoleni and Schulz, 1999) that exhibit greater degrees of "open political dissent" (Ortmann, 2010) and scrutinize political actors closer than before. This paper tracks online Singlish memes in which Singaporean netizens mock the PAP’s ’inauthentic’ expressions of Singaporean-ness and legitimize opposition politicians’ use of the language. As such, an alternative linguistic marketplace (Bourdieu, 1977) emerges in which Singlish humor is a symbol of populist resistance and solidarity. Through the analysis of these metalinguistic commentaries, I make a case for the commodification of Singlish as an ideological resource through which Singaporeans construct intersubjectivity and discuss how the nation-state is aligned with certain ways of using language.
“自省自省”:新加坡式幽默在新加坡反对党政治家崛起中的作用
自1959年新加坡首次获得自治以来,人民行动党(PAP)赢得了新加坡的每一次选举。多年来,其政权一直被政治观察家描述为威权主义(Rodan 2004;Tan 2012),对媒体的压制是一个经常被提及的例子,表明中共有能力压制截然不同的政治观点(Seow,1998)。由于媒体法规定了新闻自由并保护人民行动党的利益,反对党发现很难打破他们在民族国家的据点,在大选中也没有真正的政治竞争。然而,自2011年以来,人民行动党在“跟上时代”的社会压力下,谨慎地解除了对网络竞选的全面禁令,因此,新加坡政治经历了快速的媒体化。这导致了当地政治舞台上的两大变化。首先,新加坡主流媒体、政治组织和选民之间共生关系的转变,鼓励了“新竞争”反对党的平行崛起,这些反对党能够利用更新的、非传统的传播空间来质疑人民行动党执政的合法性(Ortmann, 2010)。为了标榜自己是精英人民行动党之外的另一种声音,他们的公开表演吸引了日益增长的民粹主义,并利用了新加坡英语这一在意识形态上有价值的语言资源来做到这一点。本文分析了反对党政客在集会上创造性地、模式化地使用与“普通新加坡人”(J. Leimgruber, 2013)联系在一起的新加坡英语,以幽默地攻击人民行动党候选人和思想。我认为,这种将幽默与语言联系起来的做法,可以让反对派政客同时将自己定位为新加坡社会的外行成员,并通过嘲笑执政党来强化自己的政治立场。其次,社交媒体和互联网上的另类新媒体的兴起创造了越来越成熟的公民(参见Mazzoleni和Schulz, 1999),他们表现出更大程度的“公开政治异议”(Ortmann, 2010),并比以前更密切地审视政治行为者。本文追踪了新加坡网民嘲弄人民行动党“不真实”的新加坡身份表达方式,并将反对党政客使用新加坡英语合法化的网上“新加坡英语”表情包。因此,出现了另一种语言市场(Bourdieu, 1977),在这种市场中,新加坡式英语幽默是民粹主义抵抗和团结的象征。通过对这些元语言评论的分析,我提出了新加坡英语作为一种意识形态资源的商品化的案例,通过这种资源,新加坡人构建主体间性,并讨论民族国家如何与某些使用语言的方式保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信