Actions by Collectives

R. Tuomela
{"title":"Actions by Collectives","authors":"R. Tuomela","doi":"10.2307/2214278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. We commonly attribute actions to collectives. Thus, we use locutions like 'Firm F produced the goods G', 'Nation N1 attacked nation N2', 'The board dismissed Jones', 'The team scored', and so on. On the basis of examples like these it seems to be a worthwhile project to accept this commonsensical view at least in part and to think that true statements of the above kind can be made. I shall do so in this paper and investigate some central philosophically and conceptually interesting problems related to actions performed by collectives. I shall below be concerned especially with studying under what conditions attributions of actions to collectives can correctly be made. The commonsensical view that actions can be and are commonly attributed to collective agents does not-under my construal of common sense at least-by itself entail that such attributions need be nonmetaphorical, nor does it entail the existence of collectives as supraindividual entities (see Section II below). And if collectives are construed as real entities, it must be admitted that they are entities clearly different from single human persons-to which action concepts and other mental concepts apply in the first place. Persons have (biological) bodies and perform bodily actions in contrast to collectives. Persons have a full-blown mental life while collectives do not. It can even be maintained that a collective is not a self-sufficient agent (e.g., in the sense of being capable of performing basic bodily actions).","PeriodicalId":153042,"journal":{"name":"Social Ontology in the Making","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Ontology in the Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2214278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

1. We commonly attribute actions to collectives. Thus, we use locutions like 'Firm F produced the goods G', 'Nation N1 attacked nation N2', 'The board dismissed Jones', 'The team scored', and so on. On the basis of examples like these it seems to be a worthwhile project to accept this commonsensical view at least in part and to think that true statements of the above kind can be made. I shall do so in this paper and investigate some central philosophically and conceptually interesting problems related to actions performed by collectives. I shall below be concerned especially with studying under what conditions attributions of actions to collectives can correctly be made. The commonsensical view that actions can be and are commonly attributed to collective agents does not-under my construal of common sense at least-by itself entail that such attributions need be nonmetaphorical, nor does it entail the existence of collectives as supraindividual entities (see Section II below). And if collectives are construed as real entities, it must be admitted that they are entities clearly different from single human persons-to which action concepts and other mental concepts apply in the first place. Persons have (biological) bodies and perform bodily actions in contrast to collectives. Persons have a full-blown mental life while collectives do not. It can even be maintained that a collective is not a self-sufficient agent (e.g., in the sense of being capable of performing basic bodily actions).
集体行动
1. 我们通常把行动归于集体。因此,我们使用诸如“公司F生产商品G”、“国家N1攻击国家N2”、“董事会解雇琼斯”、“球队得分”等措辞。在这些例子的基础上,至少部分地接受这种常识性观点,并认为可以做出上述类型的真实陈述,似乎是一个值得做的项目。我将在本文中这样做,并研究一些与集体行为有关的核心哲学和概念上有趣的问题。下面我将特别关注研究在什么条件下可以正确地将行为归因于集体。至少在我对常识的解释下,认为行为可以并且通常被归因于集体行为的常识性观点本身并不意味着这种归因必须是非隐喻性的,也不意味着集体作为超个人实体的存在(见下文第二节)。如果集体被解释为真实的实体,就必须承认它们是明显不同于单个人的实体——而行动概念和其他精神概念首先适用于单个人。个人有(生物)身体,并进行身体活动,而不是集体。个人有成熟的精神生活,而集体却没有。甚至可以认为,集体不是一个自给自足的主体(例如,在能够执行基本的身体动作的意义上)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信